2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De-anthropomorphizing energy and energy conservation: The case of Max Planck and Ernst Mach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Stein and Goldscheid were clearly drawing upon Ostwald’s energetics to underpin their own sociological interests, the nature of the relationship between Simmel and Ostwald is less clear. Simmel’s (1978 [1905]) Philosophy of Money uses the analogy of the exchange of energy in the physical world to describe the exchange of money in the economy (Wegener, 2010: 149). Although there is no direct evidence of sustained contact between Simmel and Ostwald beyond their involvement in the inception of the German Sociological Society in 1908–9 (Rammstedt, 2012), Ostwald’s later writings develop the analogy used by Simmel into a ‘full-blown theory of the economy’ (Wegener, 2010: 149).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Stein and Goldscheid were clearly drawing upon Ostwald’s energetics to underpin their own sociological interests, the nature of the relationship between Simmel and Ostwald is less clear. Simmel’s (1978 [1905]) Philosophy of Money uses the analogy of the exchange of energy in the physical world to describe the exchange of money in the economy (Wegener, 2010: 149). Although there is no direct evidence of sustained contact between Simmel and Ostwald beyond their involvement in the inception of the German Sociological Society in 1908–9 (Rammstedt, 2012), Ostwald’s later writings develop the analogy used by Simmel into a ‘full-blown theory of the economy’ (Wegener, 2010: 149).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%