1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf01539934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DDT uptake and growth ofEuglena gracilis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S. notophora and T. pyriformis accumulated about 0.5% of the DDT, whereas in B. intermedium, DDT accumulation continued until the end of the experiment, when the organism had accumulated 90%o of the DDT. Another flagellate protozoan, Euglena gracilis, also accumulated DDT without eliminating it (56). As pointed out earlier, such species can be used as indicators of DDT contamination in water.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 85%
“…S. notophora and T. pyriformis accumulated about 0.5% of the DDT, whereas in B. intermedium, DDT accumulation continued until the end of the experiment, when the organism had accumulated 90%o of the DDT. Another flagellate protozoan, Euglena gracilis, also accumulated DDT without eliminating it (56). As pointed out earlier, such species can be used as indicators of DDT contamination in water.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Selected chlorinated hydrocarbons were taken up from both water and soil by fungal and actinomycete myelia (2,8). Cells of Euglena gracilis also have been reported to take up DDT from their environment (4). These studies were concerned with uptake by intact cells, and little is known of the distribution of DDT within the cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the changes were concluded to be no greater than those caused by climate or other ecological factors (Bishop, 1947;DeKoning and Mortimer, 1971). Others reported that the effects might influence the algal population composition in nature (Lazaroff and Moore, 1966;Woodwell, et a1., 1967;Mosser, et al, 1972;Batterson, et a1., 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%