2008
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison

Abstract: In patients with SSS, DDD(R)-pacing but not AAI(R)-pacing induces significant LV desynchronization and reduction of LVEF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 50 patients with SND randomized to AAIR or DDDR pacing, dyssynchrony was more pronounced in the DDDR group than in the AAIR group at 12 months (p Ͻ0.05), reflecting a significant increase in dyssynchrony in the DDDR group without change in the AAIR group. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased significantly in the DDDR group from baseline to 12 months (63.1 Ϯ 8% vs. 59.3 Ϯ 8%, p Ͻ0.05), while left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged in the AAIR group (61.5 Ϯ 11% vs. 62.3 Ϯ 7%, p ϭ NS), thus supporting the concept that some degree of ventricular pacing may promote structural remodeling in the ventricle (43).…”
Section: Deleterious Effects Of Right Ventricular Pacingmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In 50 patients with SND randomized to AAIR or DDDR pacing, dyssynchrony was more pronounced in the DDDR group than in the AAIR group at 12 months (p Ͻ0.05), reflecting a significant increase in dyssynchrony in the DDDR group without change in the AAIR group. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased significantly in the DDDR group from baseline to 12 months (63.1 Ϯ 8% vs. 59.3 Ϯ 8%, p Ͻ0.05), while left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged in the AAIR group (61.5 Ϯ 11% vs. 62.3 Ϯ 7%, p ϭ NS), thus supporting the concept that some degree of ventricular pacing may promote structural remodeling in the ventricle (43).…”
Section: Deleterious Effects Of Right Ventricular Pacingmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In addition, the posterior wall of the LV exhibited a delayed contraction, resulting in a significant delay between the activation of the septum (61 Ϯ 5 ms) and the posterior wall (116 Ϯ 18 ms) (40). More recently, these findings have been confirmed with dedicated echocardiographic techniques (41)(42)(43)(44). From these studies, it has become apparent that RV apical pacing can induce significant intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, which has been related to reduced LV function.…”
Section: The Effects Of Rv Apical Pacingmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Divergent results on BNP levels have been reported when DDD and AAI modes were compared [13,15,16]. These studies compared different pacing modes in different groups and not the effect of 2 pacing modes in the same group as was in our case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We cannot exclude future changes in a prolonged follow-up. Asynchrony was induced by right ventricular pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation and preserved EF [12] and in patients with sick sinus syndrome [13]. The clinical meaning of dyssynchrony has not been elucidated [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%