2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HRS/ACCF Expert Consensus Statement on Pacemaker Device and Mode Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Unnecessary RV pacing should be minimized by using specific algorithms or programming longer atrioventricular delays, and this process is more important for patients with a higher risk of AF or who already have poorer LV function [49]. Patients with longer baseline PR intervals have a higher risk of AF regardless of the percentage of ventricular pacing or the length of the programmed atrioventricular interval [50].…”
Section: Non-crt Devices: Algorithms To Reduce Right Ventricular Stimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unnecessary RV pacing should be minimized by using specific algorithms or programming longer atrioventricular delays, and this process is more important for patients with a higher risk of AF or who already have poorer LV function [49]. Patients with longer baseline PR intervals have a higher risk of AF regardless of the percentage of ventricular pacing or the length of the programmed atrioventricular interval [50].…”
Section: Non-crt Devices: Algorithms To Reduce Right Ventricular Stimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-chamber pacemaker is recommended over single-chamber atrial pacing for all patients with sick sinus syndrome [14]. Also, in our patient, a concomitant atrioventricular nodal disease was expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We observed that PM programming is driven neither by the pathophysiology of rhythm disease nor by recently published recommendations. 6 Indeed, only 46.6% of patients with SSS and 28% of AVB patients in sinus rhythm received a strictly physiologic programming according to the generic principles of maintenance of AV synchrony, avoidance of unnecessary atrial/ventricular pacing when not indicated, allowance of rate increase in chronotropically incompetent patients. 7 Physiologic programming was not associated with increased mortality or hospitalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] However, only recently a general consensus on the optimal recommended pacing mode for selected rhythm disorders has been agreed and incorporated into a statement on pacemaker (PM) mode selection from HRS/ACCF. 6 Dualchamber pacing or single-chamber atrial pacing is recommended over single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction, and for patients with atrioventricular block (AVB) except in specific clinical situations (e.g. sedentary patients or those with multiple comorbidities).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%