International Symposium on Environmental Protection and Planning: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) 2012
DOI: 10.5053/isepp.2011.1-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Datum Transformation by Artificial Neural Networks for Geographic Information Systems Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the most common alternatives could be categorised into artificial intelligence technology (Zaletnyik, 2004;Lin and Wang, 2006;Tierra et al, 2008;Tierra et al, 2009;Gullu, 2010;Turgut, 2010;Gullu et al, 2011;Yilmaz and Gullu, 2012;Mihalache, 2012;Tierra and Romero, 2014), partitioning methods (Lippus, 2004;Kheloufi, 2006), Ill-posed approach Zeng and Yi, 2010;Ge and Wu, 2012), least squares algorithms (Felus and Schaffrin, 2005;Acar et al, 2006aAcar et al, , 2006bRey-Jer and Hwa-Wei, 2006;Akyilmaz, 2007;Janicka, 2011;Mahboub, 2012), quaternions approach (Shen et al, 2006;Jitka, 2011;Zeng and Yi, 2011), dynamic datum transformation approach (Soler, 1998;Soler and Marshall, 2003;Soler and Snay, 2003;Stanaway, 2008;Haasdyk and Janssen, 2011), Procrustes algorithm (Grafarend and Awange, 2003;Zeng, 2015) to mention but a few. It is important to note that coordinate transformation has been chiefly dominated by the above mentioned methods due to their achievable accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the most common alternatives could be categorised into artificial intelligence technology (Zaletnyik, 2004;Lin and Wang, 2006;Tierra et al, 2008;Tierra et al, 2009;Gullu, 2010;Turgut, 2010;Gullu et al, 2011;Yilmaz and Gullu, 2012;Mihalache, 2012;Tierra and Romero, 2014), partitioning methods (Lippus, 2004;Kheloufi, 2006), Ill-posed approach Zeng and Yi, 2010;Ge and Wu, 2012), least squares algorithms (Felus and Schaffrin, 2005;Acar et al, 2006aAcar et al, , 2006bRey-Jer and Hwa-Wei, 2006;Akyilmaz, 2007;Janicka, 2011;Mahboub, 2012), quaternions approach (Shen et al, 2006;Jitka, 2011;Zeng and Yi, 2011), dynamic datum transformation approach (Soler, 1998;Soler and Marshall, 2003;Soler and Snay, 2003;Stanaway, 2008;Haasdyk and Janssen, 2011), Procrustes algorithm (Grafarend and Awange, 2003;Zeng, 2015) to mention but a few. It is important to note that coordinate transformation has been chiefly dominated by the above mentioned methods due to their achievable accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have gained popularity in geodetic sciences community. ANNs have been used for coordinate transformation (Zaletnyik, 2004;Maria, 2012;Tierra, et al, 2008;Gullu, 2010;Weiwei and Xiudong, 2010;Gullu et al, 2011;Tierra and Romero, 2014;Ziggah et al, 2016), geoid determination (Kavzoglu and Saka, 2005;Pikridas, et al, 2011;Memarian Sorkhabi, 2015), geodetic deformation modelling (Bao et al, 2011;Chen and Zeng, 2013;Du et al, 2014;Gao et al, 2014), image and signal processing (Ibrahim, 2010;ALAllaf, 2012;Hai and Thuy, 2012) and determination of earth orientation parameters (Schuh, 2002;Liao, 2012). In this study, the feed forward back propagation (FFBP), cascade forward back propagation (CFBP) and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) were used as alternative coordinate transformation methods to conduct 2D transformation between the ED50 and ITRF96 systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assertion is well archived in existing technical papers of mathematical geodesy. For example, ANN has been applied to solve most coordinate transformation problems global and local datums [1,9,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], and transforming from geodetic coordinates to Cartesian coordinates [2] and many more. ANNs are been criticized for its long training process in achieving the optimal network's topology, and it is not easy to identify the relative importance of potential input variables, and certain interpretive difficulties [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%