2013
DOI: 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating Recent Peat Accumulation in European Ombrotrophic Bogs

Abstract: Dating recent peat accumulation in European ombrotrophic bogsvan der Plicht, J.; Yeloff, D.; van der Linden, M.; van Geel, B.; Brain, S.; Chambers, F.M.; Webb, J.; Toms, P. Published in: Radiocarbon DOI:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16057 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA):van der Plicht, J., Yeloff, D., van der Linden, M., van Geel, B., Brain, S., Chambers, F. M., ... Toms, P. (2013). Dating recent peat accumulation in European ombrotrophic bogs. Radiocarbon, 55(2-3), 1763-1778. DOI: 10.2458/azu_… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, although the dry period from c. ad 1675-1770 is close both in time and duration to that of the Maunder Minimum (ad 1645-1715), limitations of the method preclude more precise dating of the mire data, because the dating of the peat that accumulated during recent centuries is compromised by the acknowledged 'fuzziness' of the calibration (see Figure 2) and the failure of 210 Pb dating at this site. Indeed, it is unfortunate that some other methods to help date the top of the core, which can be used in Europe (Van der Plicht et al, 2013), could not be applied here. Nevertheless, the closeness of fit of the driest episodes in the mire with cold episodes noted elsewhere and with solar minima is striking, even allowing for imprecision in calibrated ages (and therefore possible inaccuracy in dating) in this part of the core.…”
Section: Suck-in and Smearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although the dry period from c. ad 1675-1770 is close both in time and duration to that of the Maunder Minimum (ad 1645-1715), limitations of the method preclude more precise dating of the mire data, because the dating of the peat that accumulated during recent centuries is compromised by the acknowledged 'fuzziness' of the calibration (see Figure 2) and the failure of 210 Pb dating at this site. Indeed, it is unfortunate that some other methods to help date the top of the core, which can be used in Europe (Van der Plicht et al, 2013), could not be applied here. Nevertheless, the closeness of fit of the driest episodes in the mire with cold episodes noted elsewhere and with solar minima is striking, even allowing for imprecision in calibrated ages (and therefore possible inaccuracy in dating) in this part of the core.…”
Section: Suck-in and Smearmentioning
confidence: 99%