2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200058094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating Bulk Sediments from Limnic Deposits Using a Grain-Size Approach

Abstract: Radiocarbon measurements on bulk subaqueous sediments typically provide ages significantly older than actual time of deposition. This is generally caused by the presence of reworked organic compounds, which are depleted in 14C. To explore this issue of age heterogeneity, we collected 4 organic-rich samples from varying depths in a lake sediment core at the Gemündener Maar (Eifel, Germany), a lake of volcanic origin. We divided each sample into 5 standard grain-size fractions: gravel, sand, silt, clay, and 1 fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that contamination with old carbon is much more common than contamination resulting in younger ages (Rothacker et al . 2013; Sirocko et al . 2013), it is assumed that the younger BETA ages are the better estimate of the time of deposition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that contamination with old carbon is much more common than contamination resulting in younger ages (Rothacker et al . 2013; Sirocko et al . 2013), it is assumed that the younger BETA ages are the better estimate of the time of deposition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age difference could be related to a size‐dependent trend, as organic sediment samples bear a higher risk of containing very small particles including planktonic and reworked material (Rothacker et al . 2013), as compared to OM samples sieved at >63‐μm mesh size. The two organic sediment samples were consequently discarded from the age‐depth model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to the environment is introduced by the low TOC and can result in smaller sample sizes prepared for the bulk radiocarbon measurement, which were affected with larger uncertainties after corrections for processing blanks and standards (Ruff et al, 2010). Nevertheless, empirical studies show that samples that contain a mixture of young and old carbon may overestimate the age of a deposit by 500-2000 years (Grimm et al, 2009;Rothacker et al, 2013). We recognise that the bulk sediment dating results contain inherent uncertainties and express reference timeframes rather than absolute ages for the processes due to a possible overestimation of the age.…”
Section: Timing Of the Klados Catchment Stratigraphy From Relative Anmentioning
confidence: 99%