2021
DOI: 10.31223/x5zw4k
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data requirements to tackle global deforestation through mandatory due diligence

Abstract: The world’s forests are highly threatened, mainly by agricultural expansion, driving biodiversity loss and greenhouse gas emissions, and disproportionately impacting rights and livelihoods of indigenous peoples and local communities. Zero-deforestation voluntary commitments to address deforestation have not significantly reversed deforestation and have made even less progress in related human rights violations. A regulation to address deforestation in agricultural supply chains will likely be prepared in the E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we have the European Union’s regulation on deforestation-free products, the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the United Kingdom’s due diligence law. These regulations aim to prevent commodities that are the products of illegal and legal deforestation and degraded ecosystems from coming into the EU and the UK markets by obliging in-scope businesses to conduct due diligence on their supply chains [ 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we have the European Union’s regulation on deforestation-free products, the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the United Kingdom’s due diligence law. These regulations aim to prevent commodities that are the products of illegal and legal deforestation and degraded ecosystems from coming into the EU and the UK markets by obliging in-scope businesses to conduct due diligence on their supply chains [ 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%