2017
DOI: 10.2204/iodp.proc.348.201.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data report: permeability and microfabric of core samples from IODP Expedition 348, Hole C0002P, Nankai Trough accretionary prism

Abstract: This report documents the results of constant-flow permeability tests in the vertical (along core) direction administered at effective isotropic confining stresses of 0.28 MPa (40 psi) and 0.55 MPa (80 psi). Specimens from the Nankai accretionary prism were collected from Hole C0002P of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program. Beds dip at steep angles (typically 80° or more) throughout the cored interval (2174.98-2209.64 meters below seafloor). We tested specimens that consist of indurated clayey siltstone and m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scale dependence of permeability in the Nankai accretionary prism. Permeabilities estimated from several methods and scales are shown, including: laboratory experiments (gray circles; Takahashi et al, 2013;Song & Underwood, 2017;Valdez (2018, supporting information), single probe Modular Formation Dynamics Tester test (green square; Saffer et al, 2013), drawdown (DD; yellow diamond) and hydraulic fracture (HF; white diamond) Modular Formation Dynamics Tester tests; Boutt et al, 2012), tidal loading response (purple star; Kinoshita et al, 2017), and cross-hole test analysis (this study; triangles). Gray area shows range of fault zone permeabilities from inverse modeling studies at several subduction margins (Saffer, 2015).…”
Section: Implications For Scale Dependence and Hydrological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scale dependence of permeability in the Nankai accretionary prism. Permeabilities estimated from several methods and scales are shown, including: laboratory experiments (gray circles; Takahashi et al, 2013;Song & Underwood, 2017;Valdez (2018, supporting information), single probe Modular Formation Dynamics Tester test (green square; Saffer et al, 2013), drawdown (DD; yellow diamond) and hydraulic fracture (HF; white diamond) Modular Formation Dynamics Tester tests; Boutt et al, 2012), tidal loading response (purple star; Kinoshita et al, 2017), and cross-hole test analysis (this study; triangles). Gray area shows range of fault zone permeabilities from inverse modeling studies at several subduction margins (Saffer, 2015).…”
Section: Implications For Scale Dependence and Hydrological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takahashi et al () conducted triaxial experiments on core samples of the accretionary prism from Site C0002 and measured permeabilities of 2.9 × 10 −19 to 2.3 × 10 −18 m 2 under estimated in situ pressure conditions (effective stress of 7.9–9.0 MPa). Song and Underwood () reported values of 4.3 × 10 −18 to 2.7 × 10 −17 m 2 from constant‐flow tests on core samples conducted at room temperature and at effective stresses of 0.28 MPa. Valdez (, supporting information) obtained permeabilities of 2.5 × 10 −18 to 5.3 × 10 −17 m 2 for core samples of the accretionary prism from Site C0009, at effective stresses of 11–12 MPa.…”
Section: Implications For Scale Dependence and Hydrological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Katz‐Thompson permeability (Katz & Thompson, 1986, 1987) of the sample from Hole C0002R is ∼3 × 10 −19 m 2 , which is 2 orders of magnitude lower than reported by Song and Underwood (2017) at ∼2,200 mbsf based on constant‐flow permeability tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%