2018
DOI: 10.3390/data3040051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data on Peer-Reviewed Papers about Green Infrastructure, Urban Nature, and City Liveability

Abstract: This data descriptor summarizes the process applied and data gathered from the contents of 87 peer-reviewed papers/sources reporting on the contribution of public green infrastructure (PGI), in the form of public parks and urban nature spaces, in the context of city liveability and general human health and well-being. These papers were collected in a systematic literature review that informed the design of a questionnaire-based survey of PGI users in Perth, Western Australia. The survey explored visitor satisf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A convenience intercept survey was implemented at the Lake Claremont PGI space on several days in December 2016 and January 2017 to coincide the with peak holiday and recreation period of the Austral summer [18,22,48]. The anonymous pen and paper self-report questionnaire used for the survey had categorical demographic questions as well as the question and paired Likert scales required for an IPA assessing 22 attributes of quality PGI spaces identified from the literature [18,28,29,46]. The IPA asked PGI users "How important are the following features of Lake Claremont to you and how satisfied are you with their management?"…”
Section: Field Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A convenience intercept survey was implemented at the Lake Claremont PGI space on several days in December 2016 and January 2017 to coincide the with peak holiday and recreation period of the Austral summer [18,22,48]. The anonymous pen and paper self-report questionnaire used for the survey had categorical demographic questions as well as the question and paired Likert scales required for an IPA assessing 22 attributes of quality PGI spaces identified from the literature [18,28,29,46]. The IPA asked PGI users "How important are the following features of Lake Claremont to you and how satisfied are you with their management?"…”
Section: Field Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency of surveying PGI users must be determined to maintain a confident understanding of the expectations of PGI users and satisfaction levels with a PGI space. The published literature is largely silent on frequency for surveying PGI satisfaction; however, informed by the literature review of Parker and Simpson [28,29], some factors to consider when determining frequency are provided in Table 4. After considering these factors (as well as other site specific factors), a suitable survey frequency can be determined.…”
Section: Frequency Of Surveyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the methods reported in the MDPI published reviews of Parker, Patroni, Walker and others [21][22][23][24] and the Data Descriptor of Simpson and others [25,26], the data reported in this data descriptor was gathered as part of a systematic quantitative literature review that was based on the approach of Pickering and Byrne [27] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%