1973
DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(73)90094-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data on fibre size in thirty-six human muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
117
3
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
27
117
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean fibre diameters of individual fibre types, with the exception of subject 5 (type 1 fibres), however, lay within the normal ranges described by Polgar et ai, 23 indicating that in abnormal human muscle an inspec tion of mean fibre diameters alone does not provide an assessment of the extent of atrophy. Preferential fibre type atrophy may be determined from the atrophy factors of individual fibre types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The mean fibre diameters of individual fibre types, with the exception of subject 5 (type 1 fibres), however, lay within the normal ranges described by Polgar et ai, 23 indicating that in abnormal human muscle an inspec tion of mean fibre diameters alone does not provide an assessment of the extent of atrophy. Preferential fibre type atrophy may be determined from the atrophy factors of individual fibre types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The differences in fibre diameters and types are also related to the gender difference 53 . Type II fibres have a larger diameter than type I fibres and are recruited later in a contraction, thus the action potential conduction velocity increases with increasing levels of contraction force 54 . This can also produce an increase in the MNF and MDF values.…”
Section: Identification and Possible Causes For The Conflicting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in MUP amplitude and area in this situation critically depend on the density of muscle fibers per volume unit, and on muscle fiber dimensions (Stålberg & Karlsson, 2001). The diameters of both, type I und type II fibers have previously been determined in human muscles from autopsy specimens (Polgar, Johnson, Weightman, & Appleton, 1973). In the LV muscle, the diameters tended to be larger than in the ES and in the BB muscles, respectively (Polgar et al., 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameters of both, type I und type II fibers have previously been determined in human muscles from autopsy specimens (Polgar, Johnson, Weightman, & Appleton, 1973). In the LV muscle, the diameters tended to be larger than in the ES and in the BB muscles, respectively (Polgar et al., 1973). The larger MUP amplitude and area values determined for the LV as compared to BB and ES muscles in the present investigation may be due to such differences in muscle fiber dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%