Data on empirically estimated corporate survival rate in Russia

Abstract

The article presents data on the corporate survival rate in Russia in 1991–2014. The empirical survey was based on a random sample with the average number of non-repeated observations (number of companies) for the survey each year equal to 75,958 (24,236 minimum and 126,953 maximum). The actual limiting mean error ∆p was 2.24% with 99% integrity. The survey methodology was based on a cross joining of various formal periods in the corporate life cycles (legal and business), which makes it possible to talk about a conventionally active time life of companies’ existence with a number of assumptions. The empirical survey values were grouped by Russian regions and industries according to the classifier and consolidated into a single database for analysing the corporate life cycle and their survival rate and searching for deviation dependencies in calculated parameters. Preliminary and incomplete figures were available in the paper entitled “Survival Rate and Lifecycle in Terms of Uncertainty: Review of Companies from Russia and Eastern Europe” (Kuzmin and Guseva, 2016) [3]. The further survey led to filtered processed data with clerical errors excluded. These particular values are available in the article. The survey intended to fill a fact-based gap in various fundamental surveys that involved matters of the corporate life cycle in Russia within the insufficient statistical framework. The data are of interest for an analysis of Russian entrepreneurship, assessment of the market development and incorporation risks in the current business environment. A further heuristic potential is achievable through an ability of forecasted changes in business demography and model building based on the representative data set.

Innovative activities in Primorsky Krai: a methodical approach to assessing the effectiveness

“…Based on statistical data from the Federal Statistical Service and the Ministry of Economic Development on a number of the most important indicators of regional development, the Primorsky Krai is a moderately promising region, although it occupies a high place in terms of "foreign investment" -17. Businessmen from Japan, the Republic of Korea, China and Norway [7].…”

“…Efficiency is determined by the ratio of the volume of economic activity in the field of innovation to the costs of economic entities in this area (140.5 million rubles) [7]. The maximum amount of sources of financing innovations belongs to the own funds of organizations, the main share of which goes to financing process innovations.…”

Transregional Coordination of Modernization Processes in Implementation of Import-substituting Policy in Russia

“…See descriptions of regions in Table 2. CFD -Central Federal District, NWFD -North-West Federal District, SFD -Southern Federal District, NCFD -North Caucasus Federal District, VFD -Volga Federal District, UFD -Ural Federal District, SFD -Siberian Federal District, FEFD -Far Eastern Federal District. Source: (Regions of Russia, 2017;Kuzmin, 2018).…”

Adaptation of Market Strategies of TNCs in Russia

“…And if in 2015-2016 years, a sharp increase in the number of closed enterprises of all forms of ownership was marked, then in 2017 there was also a significant reduction in the number of liquidated enterprises. At the end of 2014, a lower overall survival rate of companies in Russia was observed (Kuzmin, 2018), which is also seen in the sectoral structure of agriculture, animal production and crop growing, food production, etc. The turnover of organizations, on the contrary, increased in those industries where there was a reduction in the number of organizations (agriculture, hotels and restaurants, real estate transactions); a fall in turnover took place in the sectors in which an influx of new businesses was observed (mining, wholesale and retail trade, transport and communication).…”