2003
DOI: 10.1353/cul.2003.0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Made Flesh: Biotechnology and the Discourse of the Posthuman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
38
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Current readings of sci-fi as public culture have often relied on the close textual analysis of a small number of texts. Sci-fi narratives have both advocated extensive development of genetic technologies and argued for regulation and limitation of these technologies (Bendle, 2002;Thacker, 2001Thacker, , 2003Condit et al, 2002a;Gomel, 2000;Turney, 1998). Although they may have persuasive content, sci-fi narratives are roundly criticized by scientists and educators as misleading and by students as shallow and limited (Michael and Carter, 2001).…”
Section: Expressing Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current readings of sci-fi as public culture have often relied on the close textual analysis of a small number of texts. Sci-fi narratives have both advocated extensive development of genetic technologies and argued for regulation and limitation of these technologies (Bendle, 2002;Thacker, 2001Thacker, , 2003Condit et al, 2002a;Gomel, 2000;Turney, 1998). Although they may have persuasive content, sci-fi narratives are roundly criticized by scientists and educators as misleading and by students as shallow and limited (Michael and Carter, 2001).…”
Section: Expressing Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 But this line of thought dangerously entrusts sentience and self-control in the sole hands of human subjects as "agents of change," without dutifully questioning our understanding of what could be considered a human proper, therefore disregarding independent contributions of those scripted as "nonhumans" by the dominant ideology. 64 Rejecting the possibilities for technologically orchestrated humanoids to acquire the right to subjective intervention, such a vision postulates the potentiality of a future still polarized by those scripted as complete human subjects, with their alterations considered as outside this paradigm pushed towards the edges and regarded as ex-centric minor voices voided of sentience, whose role is of little importance in the larger scheme of intervention.…”
Section: The Epicenter Of Humanity: a Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether it be city planners drawing on models of circulation (Sennett 1996) or computer malfunctions that are today described and treated as "viruses," our knowledge of bodies and their biological processes has a pervasive influence on the way we organize our world (Martin 1987;Treichler 1999;Thacker 2003). Canguilhem ([1966] 1991) writes of the historical formation of concepts of normal and pathological in modern medicine (Philo 2007), but we might also take from his analysis that it is in these crossings between medical knowledge of the body and geographical knowledge of societies that many such political determinations arise.…”
Section: Vital Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%