Data integration in cardiac electrophysiology ablation toward achieving proper interoperability in health information systems

Kazemi-Arpanahi, Hadi; Shanbehzadeh, Mostafa; Mirbagheri, Esmat; Baradaran, Abdolvahab

doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_751_19

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…National Health information technology officials suggested the use of standard terminologies and data sets to enable interoperability across health information systems. Several terminologies exist that support nursing practice, but none have been broadly leveraged in Iran’s E-health system [ 17 ]. To comply with data standards, nursing specialists must decide which data items should be included in the context of patient care, and what required data could be documented by other healthcare staff [ 18 , 19 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and evaluation of an electronic nursing documentation system

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Nursing documentation is a critical aspect of the nursing care workflow. There is a varying degree in how detailed nursing reports are described in scientific literature and care practice, and no uniform structured documentation is provided. This study aimed to describe the process of designing and evaluating the content of an electronic clinical nursing documentation system (ECNDS) to provide consistent and unified reporting in this context. Methods A four-step sequential methodological approach was utilized. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) development process consisted of two phases, as follows: First, a literature review was performed to attain an exhaustive overview of the relevant elements of nursing and map the available evidence underpinning the development of the MDS. Then, the data included from the literature review were analyzed using a two-round Delphi study with content validation by an expert panel. Afterward, the ECNDS was developed according to the finalized MDS, and eventually, its performance was evaluated by involving the end-users. Results The proposed MDS was divided into administrative and clinical sections; including nursing assessment and the nursing diagnosis process. Then, a web-based system with modular and layered architecture was developed based on the derived MDS. Finally, to evaluate the developed system, a survey of 150 registered nurses (RNs) was conducted to identify the positive and negative impacts of the system. Conclusions The developed system is suitable for the documentation of patient care in nursing care plans within a legal, ethical, and professional framework. However, nurses need further training in documenting patient care according to the nursing process, and in using the standard reporting templates to increase patient safety and improve documentation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and evaluation of an electronic nursing documentation system

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development, usability and quality evaluation of the resilient mobile application for women with breast cancer

Rezaee

Asadi

Yazdani

et al. 2022

Health Science Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Mental health problems as a consequence of cancer lower the quality of life of cancer patients. Despite increasing studies of breast cancer‐focused mobile health applications (m‐Health apps), there is less research on breast cancer patients' quality of life or well‐being. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate the usability and quality of an educational m‐Health app aimed at improving the resilience of breast cancer in women. Methods This study was conducted in four phases. It included extracting the requirements of the app through the nominal group technique. Based on these results, an m‐Health app was developed and evaluated in terms of usability and quality by two scales, System Usability Scale and Mobile App Rating Scale questionnaires, respectively. Finally, the role of patients' age and educational backgrounds in the use of the app was assessed. The relationship between learnability and usability of the app was measured by the T‐Test. Results The app was developed with three user interfaces. Its usability developed from the patient's point of view scored a remarkable score of 83.20 with a 95% confidence interval. This value was too indicative of high satisfaction with the usefulness and the possibility of recommending it to other cancer survivors. The results of the quality evaluation from an expert's point of view showed that this app had good functionality. Evaluation of the role of demographic information in the use of the app showed that it can be used for all age groups with different levels of education. The app did not differ significantly between learnability and usability. Conclusion The development of m‐Health apps, based on usability principles that are suitable for all age groups with different levels of education, is welcomed by cancer patients.

show abstract