2007 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition 2007
DOI: 10.1109/date.2007.364634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Flow Transformations using Taylor Expansion Diagrams

Abstract: An original technique to transform functional representation of the design into a structural representation in form of a data flow graph (DFG) is described. A canonical, word-level data structure, Taylor Expansion Diagram (TED), is used as a vehicle to effect this transformation. The problem is formulated as that of applying a sequence of decomposition cuts to a TED that transforms it into a DFG optimized for a particular objective. A systematic approach to arrive at such a decomposition is described. Experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of TED decomposition described in this work is to find a factored form that will produce DFG with minimum hardware cost of the final, scheduled implementation. This is different than a straightforward minimization of the number of operations in the unsched-uled DFG, which has been the subject of the known previous work [3,4,12]. The TED decomposition method described here extends the work of the original cut-based decomposition of Askar [4], which was based on the identification and selection of admissible cut sequences.…”
Section: Ted Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The goal of TED decomposition described in this work is to find a factored form that will produce DFG with minimum hardware cost of the final, scheduled implementation. This is different than a straightforward minimization of the number of operations in the unsched-uled DFG, which has been the subject of the known previous work [3,4,12]. The TED decomposition method described here extends the work of the original cut-based decomposition of Askar [4], which was based on the identification and selection of admissible cut sequences.…”
Section: Ted Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is different than a straightforward minimization of the number of operations in the unsched-uled DFG, which has been the subject of the known previous work [3,4,12]. The TED decomposition method described here extends the work of the original cut-based decomposition of Askar [4], which was based on the identification and selection of admissible cut sequences. The cut-based method was applicable only to TED graphs characterized by the presence of simple cuts: additive and multiplicative edges whose removal would separate the graph into two disjoint subgraphs, and hence was limited only to the disjoint decomposition.…”
Section: Ted Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pattern finding in CDFG has also been studied to identify oft repeated patterns and synthesize them as individual hardware blocks. In [84] where the authors propose an algorithm to find recurring patterns in an application through subgraph enumeration, pruning and matching techniques in compute intensive applications. These patterns are then mapped to FPGAs.…”
Section: Compilation Of Design Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%