2016
DOI: 10.1002/cav.1695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data‐driven projection method in fluid simulation

Abstract: Physically based fluid simulation requires much time in numerical calculation to solve Navier-Stokes equations. Especially in grid-based fluid simulation, because of iterative computation, the projection step is much more time-consuming than other steps. In this paper, we propose a novel data-driven projection method using an artificial neural network to avoid iterative computation. Once the grid resolution is decided, our data-driven method could obtain projection results in relatively constant time per grid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other graphics works have targeted learning flow descriptors with CNNs [CT17], or learning the statistics of splash formation [UHT17], and two‐dimensional control problems [MTP∗18]. While pressure projection algorithms with CNNs [TSSP16, YYX16] shares similarities with our work on first sight, they are largely orthogonal. Instead of targeting divergence freeness for a single instance in time, our work aims for learning its temporal evolution over the course of many time steps.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other graphics works have targeted learning flow descriptors with CNNs [CT17], or learning the statistics of splash formation [UHT17], and two‐dimensional control problems [MTP∗18]. While pressure projection algorithms with CNNs [TSSP16, YYX16] shares similarities with our work on first sight, they are largely orthogonal. Instead of targeting divergence freeness for a single instance in time, our work aims for learning its temporal evolution over the course of many time steps.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An LSTM‐based method for predicting changes of the pressure field for multiple subsequent time steps has been presented by [WBT18], resulting in significant speed‐ups of the pressure solver. For a single time step, a CNN‐based pressure projection was likewise proposed [TSSP17, YYX16]. In contrast to our work, these models only replace the pressure projection stage of the solver, and hence are specifically designed to accelerate the enforcement of divergence‐freeness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of fluid simulation, Ladický et al employ the regression forest to approximate the acceleration of fluid particles in real‐time SPH. Yang et al utilized an artificial NN to avoid a time‐consuming projection step in the Eulerian method; a similar method is also proposed in the work of Tompson et al with convolutional NN. Furthermore, machine learning technology is successfully applied to patch‐based detail enhancement, superresolution smoke, deformation‐aware fluid, and a Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%