2018
DOI: 10.1137/17m1145136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Filtered Reduced Order Modeling of Fluid Flows

Abstract: We propose a data-driven filtered reduced order model (DDF-ROM) framework for the numerical simulation of fluid flows. The novel DDF-ROM framework consists of two steps: (i) In the first step, we use explicit ROM spatial filtering of the nonlinear PDE to construct a filtered ROM. This filtered ROM is low-dimensional, but is not closed (because of the nonlinearity in the given PDE). (ii) In the second step, we use data-driven modeling to close the filtered ROM, i.e., to model the interaction between the resolve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
177
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(221 reference statements)
2
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the CDDC‐ROM and DDC‐ROM are more accurate than the G‐ROM, the computational cost of calculating trueA˜ and trueB˜ in the off‐line phase can be significant. Thus, in the work of Xie et al, we proposed the following practical approach for reducing the computational cost of trueA˜ and trueB˜ calculation: since d , the rank of the snapshot matrix, can be large in practical applications, instead of using udX1ptd to compute the Correction term in , we utilized the following approximation: ()truefalse(ud·false)0.1emudrfalse(ur·false)0.1emur,φi()truefalse(um·false)0.1emumrfalse(ur·false)0.1emur,φi, ∀ i = 1,…, r . In , we replaced u d with u m and the ROM projection on X d with the ROM projection on X m .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the CDDC‐ROM and DDC‐ROM are more accurate than the G‐ROM, the computational cost of calculating trueA˜ and trueB˜ in the off‐line phase can be significant. Thus, in the work of Xie et al, we proposed the following practical approach for reducing the computational cost of trueA˜ and trueB˜ calculation: since d , the rank of the snapshot matrix, can be large in practical applications, instead of using udX1ptd to compute the Correction term in , we utilized the following approximation: ()truefalse(ud·false)0.1emudrfalse(ur·false)0.1emur,φi()truefalse(um·false)0.1emumrfalse(ur·false)0.1emur,φi, ∀ i = 1,…, r . In , we replaced u d with u m and the ROM projection on X d with the ROM projection on X m .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a fixed r ≤ d and a given u ∈ X h (where X h is the FE space), the ROM projection seeks trueurXr such that ()trueur,φj=false(bold-italicu,φjfalse)1em0.1emj=1,,r. Filtering the NSE (see Section 3.2 in the work of Xie et al for details), we obtain the spatially filtered ROM , as follows: ()urt,φi+Re1false(ur,φifalse)+()false(ur·false)0.1emur,φi+()τrSFS,φi=bold0, where the ROM stress tensor is bold-italicτrSFS=truefalse(ud·false)0.1emudrfalse(ur·false)0.1emur. The spatially filtered ROM can be written as truea˙=A0.1embold-italica+a0.1emB0.1embold-italica+bold-italicτ, where A and B are the same as those in and the components of τ are given by …”
Section: Data‐driven Correction Rommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations