2020
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2020-397
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven distinction between convective, frontal and mixed extreme rainfall events in radar data

Abstract: Abstract. This study examines characteristics of extreme events based on a high-resolution precipitation dataset (5-minute temporal resolution, 1 &times 1 km spatial resolution) over an area of 1824 km2 covering the catchment of the river Wupper, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Extreme events were sampled by a Peak Over Threshold method using several sampling strategies, all based on selecting an average of three events per year. A simple identification- and tracking algorithm for rain cells based on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe this is due to the presence of multiple data generating processes in the climate model. Precipitation is typically generated by either high intensity events with localised spatial profiles, i.e., convective cells, or low intensity events with much large spatial profiles, i.e., frontal storms (Thomassen et al, 2020). In the absence of covariates to distinguish between these events in the data, we use a higher exceedance threshold to remove any frontal events; this is discussed further in Section 5.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe this is due to the presence of multiple data generating processes in the climate model. Precipitation is typically generated by either high intensity events with localised spatial profiles, i.e., convective cells, or low intensity events with much large spatial profiles, i.e., frontal storms (Thomassen et al, 2020). In the absence of covariates to distinguish between these events in the data, we use a higher exceedance threshold to remove any frontal events; this is discussed further in Section 5.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For urban drainage systems, the complexity may increase because the input of rain is stochastic and temporally and spatially varying by nature and because run-off depends on past weather events, as well as many other time-varying phenomena. These present challenges to urban hydrology and rainfall-runoff modeling, which are still subject to intensive research [43][44][45]. Underground pipes are also sometimes in poor condition, resulting in increased infiltration or exfiltration.…”
Section: Living Digital Twins For Water Distribution and Urban Drainage Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitchcock et al (2021) also studied the characteristics of linear precipitation systems and their contributions in heavy rainfall over Melbourne by applying an object-based approach over a weather radar data near Melbourne. Similar object-based radar studies have been conducted in Sydney (Potts et al 2000), Southeast Queensland (Peter et al 2015) and other parts of the world such as Germany (Thomassen et al 2020), Italy (Sangiorgio and Barindelli 2020) and Spain (Rigo et al 2010). This technique has also been applied over satellite datasets to study the global climatology of different storm types (Nesbitt et al 2000;Jiang et al 2011;Wall et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%