2022
DOI: 10.1214/22-aoas1609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling extremes of spatial aggregates of precipitation using conditional methods

Abstract: Inference on the extremal behaviour of spatial aggregates of precipitation is important for quantifying river flood risk. There are two classes of previous approach, with one failing to ensure self-consistency in inference across different regions of aggregation and the other imposing highly restrictive assumptions. To overcome these issues, we propose a model for high-resolution precipitation data, from which we can simulate realistic fields and explore the behaviour of spatial aggregates. Recent developments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, it is possible to extend our copula approach to explicitly capture temporal dependence by adapting the kernel parameter according to temporal information. Other improvements particular to the modelling of extreme rainfall events could be made to the JGNM by considering extreme value distributions [Behrens et al, 2004, MacDonald et al, 2011, Ding et al, 2019, Gao et al, 2021, Richards et al, 2022, either entirely or by adding them as a mixture term in the tail. Finally, we acknowledge that imposing a Gaussian covariance structure, while computationally appealing and leading to easy spatial modelling, might be too restrictive, especially for extreme variations in rainfall levels at close-by locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, it is possible to extend our copula approach to explicitly capture temporal dependence by adapting the kernel parameter according to temporal information. Other improvements particular to the modelling of extreme rainfall events could be made to the JGNM by considering extreme value distributions [Behrens et al, 2004, MacDonald et al, 2011, Ding et al, 2019, Gao et al, 2021, Richards et al, 2022, either entirely or by adding them as a mixture term in the tail. Finally, we acknowledge that imposing a Gaussian covariance structure, while computationally appealing and leading to easy spatial modelling, might be too restrictive, especially for extreme variations in rainfall levels at close-by locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling extreme rainfall through a Brown-Resnick process, Richards and Wadsworth [2021] resort to a composite likelihood approach as an alternative to a computationally unfeasible MLE. More recently, in Richards et al [2022] and Richards et al [2023], authors use a censored Gaussian copula model for the dependence of extreme rainfall events, circumventing the unavailable likelihood by adopting a pseudo-likelihood approach with spatially-informed sub-sampling. Outside of rainfall forecasting, Dobra and Lenkoski [2011] model graphical binary and ordinal variables in a Bayesian framework with a latent Gaussian copula, requiring an approximation to the likelihood function with the extended rank likelihood of D. Hoff [2007].…”
Section: Copula Estimation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given any i ∈ BA val , we assume all observations in the set BAP N i follow the semiparametric marginal distribution given in [24]. This distribution was proposed for modelling precipitation data, which are similar to wildfire data in the sense that they typically contain a large number of zero observations.…”
Section: A Semi-parametric Approach For Modelling Bapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a map of the 28 manual stations analysed. Flood events are mainly determined by aggregations in space and/or time of extreme rainfalls (Richards et al, 2021). A spatio-temporal study of threshold exceedances of the rainfall process, therefore, has important practical implications in evaluating flood risk.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%