2019
DOI: 10.1101/517961
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven detection of subtype-specific and differentially expressed genes

Abstract: Tissue or cell subtype-specific and differentially-expressed genes (SDEGs) are defined as being differentially expressed in a particular tissue or cell subtype among multiple subtypes. Detecting SDEGs plays a critical rolse in molecularly characterizing and identifying tissue or cell subtypes, and facilitating supervised deconvolution of complex tissues. Unfortunately, classic differential analysis assumes a convenient null hypothesis and associated test statistic that is subtype-non-specific and thus, resulti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to previous work, the effort to detect SMG can be traced back to One-Versus-Rest (OVR) test (Yu, Feng et al 2010), One-Versus-One (OVO) test (Hunt, Freytag et al 2019), and most recently One-Versus-Everyone (OVE) test (Wang, Hoffman et al 2016). We and others have recognized that the test statistics used by most existing methods do not exactly satisfy SMG definition (1) and often require ad hoc OVE set intersection (Yu, Feng et al 2010, Hunt, Freytag et al 2019, Chen, Lu et al 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In relation to previous work, the effort to detect SMG can be traced back to One-Versus-Rest (OVR) test (Yu, Feng et al 2010), One-Versus-One (OVO) test (Hunt, Freytag et al 2019), and most recently One-Versus-Everyone (OVE) test (Wang, Hoffman et al 2016). We and others have recognized that the test statistics used by most existing methods do not exactly satisfy SMG definition (1) and often require ad hoc OVE set intersection (Yu, Feng et al 2010, Hunt, Freytag et al 2019, Chen, Lu et al 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, COT framework is efficient in that neither OVE set intersection nor intractable sample permutation is needed in estimating the null distribution (Hunt, Freytag et al 2019, Chen, Lu et al 2020, where a significant majority of genes are assumed to be associated with the null hypothesis. The null distribution plays a crucial role in large-scale multiple testing.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations