2021
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

swCAM: estimation of subtype-specific expressions in individual samples with unsupervised sample-wise deconvolution

Abstract: Motivation Complex biological tissues are often a heterogeneous mixture of several molecularly distinct cell subtypes. Both subtype compositions and subtype-specific expressions can vary across biological conditions. Computational deconvolution aims to dissect patterns of bulk tissue data into subtype compositions and subtype-specific expressions. Existing deconvolution methods can only estimate averaged subtype-specific expressions in a population, while many downstream analyses such as infe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We provide a real data comparison of sample-level cell type specific expression imputation, including off-the-shelf machine learning methods, multivariate LASSO and RIDGE, as comparators. Correlation has been used to evaluate the accuracy of predicted cell-type expression, and good correlations per subject have been reported 13,20,23 , consistent with our observations. However, we also found high correlations in between-subject comparisons (Supplementary Figure 8), which presumably reflects that cell type explains the greatest proportion of variability in gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We provide a real data comparison of sample-level cell type specific expression imputation, including off-the-shelf machine learning methods, multivariate LASSO and RIDGE, as comparators. Correlation has been used to evaluate the accuracy of predicted cell-type expression, and good correlations per subject have been reported 13,20,23 , consistent with our observations. However, we also found high correlations in between-subject comparisons (Supplementary Figure 8), which presumably reflects that cell type explains the greatest proportion of variability in gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Another limitation of the current existing ST deconvolution methods is that most of them only infer cell type proportions but do not estimate cell-type-specific (CTS) gene expression at each spot, which is equally important for ST data analysis. For bulk RNA-seq data, many methods have been developed for CTS genes expression inference, such as TCA ( Rahmani et al , 2019 ), CIBERSORTx ( Newman et al , 2019 ), bMIND ( Wang et al , 2021 ) and swCAM ( Chen et al , 2022 ). However, for the ST data, only RCTD can infer the CTS gene expression at each spot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell-type gene expressions can be deconvoluted from bulk-tissue expression data. Methods have been developed to estimate cell-type expressions for each sample, such as bMIND( 28 ), swCAM( 29 ), and TCA( 30 ). We call this sample-wise deconvolution of gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%