2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven building archetypes for urban building energy modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in terms of spatial scalability, we can see how regression-based approaches can be used to model the performance of construction technologies, considering building fabric heat transfer (Bauwens and Roels, 2014;Erkoreka et al, 2016;Giraldo-Soto et al, 2018;Uriarte et al, 2019), or whole building energy behaviour (Masuda and Claridge, 2014;Lin and Claridge, 2015;Paulus et al, 2015). Going beyond single buildings, we can find examples of applications regarding building stock (Meng and Mourshed, 2017;Meng et al, 2020) and community and city scale systems (Qomi et al, 2016;Pasichnyi et al, 2019), considering also complex interactions with the urban environment and physicalstatistical interpretation of models (Afshari et al, 2017). A summary of the topics and sub-topics emerging from the review of regression-based approaches for operation phase analysis is reported in Table 3.…”
Section: Regression Models In Operational Phase Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in terms of spatial scalability, we can see how regression-based approaches can be used to model the performance of construction technologies, considering building fabric heat transfer (Bauwens and Roels, 2014;Erkoreka et al, 2016;Giraldo-Soto et al, 2018;Uriarte et al, 2019), or whole building energy behaviour (Masuda and Claridge, 2014;Lin and Claridge, 2015;Paulus et al, 2015). Going beyond single buildings, we can find examples of applications regarding building stock (Meng and Mourshed, 2017;Meng et al, 2020) and community and city scale systems (Qomi et al, 2016;Pasichnyi et al, 2019), considering also complex interactions with the urban environment and physicalstatistical interpretation of models (Afshari et al, 2017). A summary of the topics and sub-topics emerging from the review of regression-based approaches for operation phase analysis is reported in Table 3.…”
Section: Regression Models In Operational Phase Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal Monthly (Abels et al, 2011;Hallinan et al, 2011a, Hallinan et al, 2011bLammers et al, 2011;Server et al, 2011) Daily (Masuda and Claridge, 2012b;Danov et al, 2013;Masuda and Claridge, 2014;Paulus et al, 2015;Hitchin and Knight, 2016;Paulus, 2017) Hourly (Jalori and Reddy, 2015b;Abushakra and Paulus, 2016) Spatial Building fabric heat transfer (Bauwens and Roels, 2014;Erkoreka et al, 2016;Giraldo-Soto et al, 2018;Uriarte et al, 2019) Building energy behaviour (Masuda and Claridge, 2014;Lin and Claridge, 2015;Paulus et al, 2015) Building stock energy behaviour (Meng and Mourshed, 2017;Meng et al, 2020) Community and city scale analysis energy behaviour (Qomi et al, 2016;Pasichnyi et al, 2019) regression-based approaches that could be used to create scalable (temporally and spatially) integrated data analysis workflows from design to operation in buildings. In this sense, we showed how data analysis techniques could be used to evaluate the impact of both technical and human factors, with the aim of reconstructing building stock data at multiple levels.…”
Section: Sub Topic Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stockholm situation has been previously documented [6,27] and well described in a figure that presents a timeline of the available power capacity contrasted with the expected growing electricity demand. However, the additional power capacity agreed upon with the heat utility is not included in the aforementioned studies.…”
Section: Power Capacity Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robustness and resilience are two complementary concepts applied in various energy studies, including energy security assessment (Martišauskas et al 2018), building energy design and retrofits (Ascione et al 2017), grading building energy performance (e.g., energy use intensity, total energy, peak power) (Papadopoulos and Kontokosta 2019), and energy installation (e.g., heating source, ventilation system, status of refurbishment) (Pasichnyi et al 2019), to deal with the increasing uncertainties and meta-complexities that characterize energy systems in cities. Resilience refers to the ability of a system to "rebound" or withstand initial shock (interruptions) (Hughes 2015), while robustness is the capacity to maintain functions of a system (policy, political system, organization, or institution) in spite of uncertainty (Capano and Woo 2017).…”
Section: From Robustness To Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%