2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Deposit in a CKAN Repository: A Dublin Core-Based Simplified Workflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 covers important stages of the data lifecycle. The DMPOnline tool 4 is used to create the plans, the LabTablet 5 for data collection, the Dendro platform 6 for data organization and description, and the INESC TEC research data repository 7 [ 10 , 12 ] for data publishing.…”
Section: The Collaborative Methods Between Data Steward and Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 covers important stages of the data lifecycle. The DMPOnline tool 4 is used to create the plans, the LabTablet 5 for data collection, the Dendro platform 6 for data organization and description, and the INESC TEC research data repository 7 [ 10 , 12 ] for data publishing.…”
Section: The Collaborative Methods Between Data Steward and Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, a specific set of attributes and descriptors outlined in Table 2 were defined for each element of the hierarchy. The establishment of these attributes and descriptors adhered to the recommended model presented in Karimova et al (2019) for documenting research data repositories using the CKAN metadata scheme in conjunction with Dublin Core standard terms. The resulting GITCE-ODE RDMS metadata schema also includes the use of a custom catalog for SDG tagging and supporting custom fields for extended resource description when necessary.…”
Section: Organizational Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vezzani [30] presented TriMED, a digital library of terminological records designed to satisfy the information needs of different categories of users within the healthcare field. Castro described the results of two exploratory studies: in [27] the authors adopt a researcher-curator collaborative approach involving researchers in metadata description and discussing the use of generic and domain-oriented metadata; in [17] the authors analyze a data deposition workflow in CKAN using a Dublin Core metadata model for non-expert users. Luzi and Ruggieri [21] presented the OpenUp project pilot on research data sharing, validation, and dissemination in Social Sciences, intending to investigate the applicability of peer review and/or Open Peer Review to datasets in disciplines related to Social sciences.…”
Section: Research Communities and Research Datamentioning
confidence: 99%