2000
DOI: 10.1515/zfgl.2000.28.3.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Das Partizip II in hochdeutschen periphrastischen Verbalfügungen im 9. – 15. Jh. Zur Ausbildung des analytischen Sprachbaus

Abstract: l Ich bedanke mich bei der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung für die finanzielle Unterstützung meines Forschungsvorhabens sowie bei Frau Prof. Dr. Karin Donhauser (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Leiterin des Teüprojekts "Funktionale Kategorien zwischen Syntax, Morphologie und Lexikon", in dessen Rahmen mein Forschungsthema bearbeitet wird, Prof. em. Dr. Erwin Arndt (Berlin) und Prof. Dr. Hans-Werner Eroms (Passau), mit denen ich die folgenden Ausführungen habe diskutieren können.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could suggest that Old Saxon speakers preferred to use a noun instead of a verb to convey their gratitude. This choice may also be related to the fact that present participles, which is the form in which "to thank" appears in (5), at this stage were still perceived as adjectives instead as verbs (Kotin, 2003(Kotin, , 2009Concu, 2016Concu, , 2022. Thus, the use of the noun ôlat to intensify the expression of gratitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could suggest that Old Saxon speakers preferred to use a noun instead of a verb to convey their gratitude. This choice may also be related to the fact that present participles, which is the form in which "to thank" appears in (5), at this stage were still perceived as adjectives instead as verbs (Kotin, 2003(Kotin, , 2009Concu, 2016Concu, , 2022. Thus, the use of the noun ôlat to intensify the expression of gratitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%