Darwin's monkey: Why baboons can't become human

Abstract

Baboons were used in the past as models for human evolution. I utilize 40 years of data from my long-term study on baboons in Kenya to suggest that baboons are once again relevant for understanding human evolution, not as a referential model but to reset the starting conditions of the human experiment. The baboon data also offer a critique of widely held ideas about how natural selection might work by looking at real lives in real time. This situates competition in a matrix of collaboration and illustrates the critical role of chance, contingency, and history in baboon survival and success. I make three methodological moves to reach these conclusions. The first is to focus on process not just outcome. The second is to look at time scales longer than usual studies but shorter than evolutionary time as a way to open the black box that currently links behavior to evolutionary value. The third is to use comparative natural history, Darwin's method, as a way to capture and comprehend how complexity is generated and how baboons deal with it in their daily lives. These empirical and methodological turns lead to conclusions that run counter to widely held ideas about baboons, about primates, and about the determinism of natural selection. I follow my own research history to illustrate these points. The discussion ranges from alternative interpretations of the male and the female dominance hierarchies, to insights from a fission that happened when the foraging strategy of raiding and nonraiding baboons diverged, to evidence of adaptation after translocation, and finally to assessing two unusual fusions of baboon groups. Altogether, these natural histories yield baboon ''principles of the social'' with insights about cognition, cooperation, and culture and suggest why baboons can't become human. The data also support Weiss and Buchanan's framework (The Mermaid's Tale: Four Billion Years of Cooperation in the Making of Living Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009. 305 p) with its alternative view of natural selection in which there is more slippage and tolerance, multiple solutions with larger acceptability spaces, and the possibility that an adaptive fit will be ''good enough'' rather than seamless. However, capturing behavioral complexity ''in the wild'' poses methodological challenges. Long-term field studies provide critical information but the current quantitative methods should be expanded also include natural history observations of behaviors and events across time, space, groups, and landscapes. Finally, the baboon natural histories illustrate how the evolutionary game has changed in the Anthropocene yielding a cautionary tale about the future for many primate species. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 55:3-23, 2012. Baboons have played a central role both in our understanding of primates and as models for human evolution beginning with Zuckerman's 1932 description of primate society. Based on his observations of Hamadryas baboons at the London Zoo, he argued for a society founded on sex, violence, and ma...

Searching for the “Roots” of Masculinity in Primates and the Human Evolutionary Past

“…In many complex social, mammalian species, as in primates, behavioral diversity and plasticity in the form of social traditions are significant phenomena in that they can develop such that they supplement genetic transmission with social transmission and can play central roles in shaping the behavior, ecology, and even biology, of populations (e.g., Whitehead et al 2019). Therefore, social lives, roles, histories, and the manners in which they are constructed and develop can be causally significant, and structuring, in primate behavior (Strier 2009;Strum 2012), and given human social, historical, and political complexity, such patterns and processes are especially important in the assessment of human evolutionary trajectories (Fuentes 2018;van Schaik 2016).…”

GPS-identified vulnerabilities of savannah-woodland primates to leopard predation and their implications for early hominins

“…Since the 1960s, when ଏeld studies of primates began in earnest, predation has been viewed as a strong selection pressure affecting primate evolution, spurring morphological, cognitive, and social antipredator adaptations in the order (DeVore and Washburn, 1963;Crook and Gartlan, 1966;Dunbar, 1988;Willems and van Schaik, 2017), including early hominins as they expanded out of African forests into mosaic savannah-woodland environments (Reed, 1997) where predation has long been considered especially intense (Crook and Gartlan, 1966;Dunbar, 1988). Non-human primates that live in such semiarid environments today have long served as models for reconstructing the behavior of these extinct hominins (DeVore and Washburn, 1963;Crook and Gartlan, 1966;Dunbar, 1988;Isbell et al, 1998;Elton, 2007;Bettridge and Dunbar, 2012;Strum, 2012;Willems and van Schaik, 2017). Two model primate species, vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) and olive baboons (Papio anubis), live in multimale, multifemale groups and often occur sympatrically in semiarid savannahwoodlands of sub-Saharan Africa (Melnick and Pearl, 1987).…”

Integrative Anthropology and the Human Niche: Toward a Contemporary Approach to Human Evolution

“…When analytical models are introduced, they are often modeled as a single individual interacting in a landscape populated by other single individuals or as groups competing with other groups, with the dyadic encounter (between individuals or between groups) as the core pattern of interface between them (e.g., Choi and Bowles ). But heightened social and behavioral density and concomitant social complexity is a widespread, and potentially ancient, primate pattern, and the social networks of many primates are multidimensional and not best modeled as sequences of dyadic exchanges at either the individual or group level (Barrett et al ; Strum ; see also Hinde ). So in thinking about human evolution, social and behavioral complexity and multifaceted interactions, not single trait or dyadic encounter foci, should be the baseline.…”

“…Behavioral and social inheritances play particularly salient roles in evolutionary patterns for many primate species (Campbell et al ; Strum ), especially members of the genus Homo (Andersson et al ; Henrich ; Kendal ). In this light it is important to incorporate multiple evolutionarily relevant processes of inheritance (not just genetic but also epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic–cultural) into evolutionary models (Bonduriansky and Day ; Jablonka and Lamb ; Ledón‐Rettig et al ).…”