2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPS-identified vulnerabilities of savannah-woodland primates to leopard predation and their implications for early hominins

Abstract: Predation is thought to have been a key selection pressure in primate evolution, especially in the savannah-woodland habitats where several early hominin species lived. However, predator-primate prey relationships are still poorly understood because human presence often deters predators, limiting our ability to quantify the impact of predation. Synchronized high-resolution tracking of leopards (Panthera pardus), vervets (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), and olive baboons (Papio anubis) during a 14-month study in Keny… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(117 reference statements)
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, in the two instances in which researchers were spotted by a leopard in close pursuit of a gelada, the natural outcomes of these interactions may have been altered. As such, the use of GPS collars on both predators and prey (e.g., Isbell et al, 2018) and other noninvasive data collection methods (camera trapping, fecal surveys, etc.) are promising avenues for supplementing direct observations of predator–prey interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further, in the two instances in which researchers were spotted by a leopard in close pursuit of a gelada, the natural outcomes of these interactions may have been altered. As such, the use of GPS collars on both predators and prey (e.g., Isbell et al, 2018) and other noninvasive data collection methods (camera trapping, fecal surveys, etc.) are promising avenues for supplementing direct observations of predator–prey interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among predators known to predate upon primates, large felids are especially important, having been implicated in more primate attacks than any other category of predator, including raptors, canids, hyaenids, small carnivores, and reptiles (Hart, 2007). The most widespread of the large felids (Jacobson et al, 2016), leopards ( Panthera pardus ) are known to prey on a wide range of extant catarrhine primates, including Asian and African colobines, guenons, mangabeys, baboons, great apes, and humans (Busse, 1980; D'Amour, Hohmann, & Fruth, 2006; Isbell, 1990; Isbell, Bidner, Van Cleave, Matsumoto‐Oda, & Crofoot, 2018; Karanth & Sundquist, 1995; Koziarski, Kissui, & Kiffner, 2016; Matsumoto‐Oda, Isbell, & Bidner, 2018; Naha, Sathyakumar, & Rawat, 2018; Tutin & Benirschke, 1991; Zuberbühler & Jenny, 2002). There is also evidence from the fossil record suggesting that leopards preyed on now‐extinct hominins (e.g., Paranthropus robustus : Brain, 1970; Homo neanderthalensis : Camarós, Cueto, Lorenzo, Villaverde, & Rivals, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several recent studies used alternative methods including GPS data from collared primates and/or their predators (Adams & Kitchen, ; Bidner, Matsumoto‐Oda, & Isbell, ; Isbell & Bidner, ; Isbell, Bidner, van Cleave, Matsumoto‐Oda, & Crofoot, ), camera traps (Boyer‐Ontl & Pruetz, ; Farris et al, ; Isbell & Bidner, ), or predator scats for dietary analysis (Dollar, Ganzhorn, & Goodman, ; Irwin et al, ; Jooste, Pitman, van Hoven, & Swanepoel, ; Lenz & dos Reis, ; McGraw, Cooke, & Shultz, ; Shultz & Dunbar, ; Shultz, Noë, McGraw, & Dunbar, ). For example, Isbell et al () were able to identify encounters between GPS‐collared predators and primates without human interference using predator and prey spatial coordinates to determine when and where species interacted. Camera traps also allowed researchers to collect behavioral data without direct observation (Boyer‐Ontl & Pruetz, ; Farris et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%