Darstellung und Bewertung von Hybridantrieben mit einem Hybrid-Erlebnis-Prototypen

Albers, Albert; Matros, Kevin; Behrendt, Matthias; Holzer, Heidelinde; Bohne, Wolfram; Ars, Halil

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-23775-2_13

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Within the scope of the case study, the customer value and thus the energy consumption of the vehicle were reduced by more than 3% using the extended validation environment (Freeman 2010; Albers et al. 2014 a , b , 2016; Gausemeier 2014). At the same time, the e-driving experience, which could not be expressed objectively before, was determined and significantly improved.…”

Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A broad empirical study underlined that most products are developed in generations (Albers et al 2014a). Thus, new products should be classified by the share of subsystems that have been newly developed and by subsystems that are carried over in order to reduce risk and cost (Albers et al 2014b). A new product generation is always based on at least one existing product.…”

Section: Product Generation Engineering -Pgementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, the driver is provided with information on the current virtual vehicle conditions, such as, e.g., speed, e-power and battery charge level, etc., by means of a digital display. By changing the virtual model in terms of drive train topology and strategy, a wide variety of drives and functions can be implemented and evaluated without great effort (Albers et al 2014b).…”

Section: Use Of Existing Reference Products To Extend the Validation mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By changing the virtual model in terms of drive train topology and strategy, a wide variety of drives and functions can be implemented and evaluated without great effort (Albers et al. 2014 b ).…”

Section: Case Study On Validation In Agile Product Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Agile product engineering through continuous validation in PGE – Product Generation Engineering

Albers¹,

Behrendt²,

Klingler³

et al. 2017

Des. Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most products are developed in generations. This needs to be considered with regard to development methods and processes to make existing knowledge available to achieve increased efficiency. To realize this, the approach of PGE -product generation engineering -is formulated. Product generation engineering is understood as the development of products based on reference products (precursor or competitor products). The subsystems are either adapted to the new product generation by means of carryover or they are newly developed based on shape variation or principle variation. Validation is considered as the central activity in the product engineering process and is a major challenge, especially for complex mechatronic systems. Therefore, it is important to understand validation as an ongoing activity during product development. The pull principle of validation describes the definition and development of validation activities, including models and validation environments based on specific validation objectives. In order to have effectiveness within validation of subsystems, it is necessary to map the interactions with the overall system, namely the super-system. The relevant subsystems can be connected under consideration of functional and energetic aspects by means of virtual, physical or mixed virtual-physical modeling applied by the holistic IPEK-X-in-the-Loop approach within the integrated Product engineering Model (iPeM).

show abstract