2014 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccd.2014.6974729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark silicon aware power management for manycore systems under dynamic workloads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare different characteristics of the manycore system under four different management scenarios: 1) our multiobjective controller (MOC) with proactive disturbance rejection (PDR), 2) PGCapping [7] where only core's powerperformance ratio is considered as feedback for the PCPG and per-core DVFS actuation, 3) DSAPM [9] where no information regarding performance and packet injection rate of PEs is used as feedback, and 4) without TSP/TDP constraint. Without TSP/TDP constraint is the scenario where the system is not limited in terms of maximum power consumption.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare different characteristics of the manycore system under four different management scenarios: 1) our multiobjective controller (MOC) with proactive disturbance rejection (PDR), 2) PGCapping [7] where only core's powerperformance ratio is considered as feedback for the PCPG and per-core DVFS actuation, 3) DSAPM [9] where no information regarding performance and packet injection rate of PEs is used as feedback, and 4) without TSP/TDP constraint. Without TSP/TDP constraint is the scenario where the system is not limited in terms of maximum power consumption.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haghbayan et al [9] present a power management technique for many-core systems using power feedback from the system to meet the TDP bound. This technique is also categorized into the class of single objective control approaches as it lacks feedbacks from workload characteristics and per-core performance measurements from the system during DVFS process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adaptive power capping techniques monitor the power consumption and actuate power knobs in a closed loop, in case of power consumption exceeding TDP. A PID controller based power management is presented in [13], where knob settings are actuated for power capping as per normalized gain of PID. Vega et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average service time for different knob combinations is shown in Figure 4(a). In case of using DVFS and PG knobs [13], per-application run-time increases forcing incoming applications to wait longer, resulting in high service time. The combination of DVFS and PG has relatively better service time using the power management algorithm, as in [5], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%