Dar kartą apie intertekstualumą. Ką jis sako apie mokslinį tekstą? | Intertextuality in research writing revisited

Petrauskaitė, Rūta; Šinkūnienė, Jolanta

doi:10.15388/klbt.2015.8943

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(plg. Valotka, 2017;Petrauskaitė & Šinkūnienė, 2015;Koženiauskienė, 2013, 60-86). Intertekstai nutiesia prasminį teksto ryšį su kitais diskursais.…”

Section: Komentarų Intertekstualumas: Citatos Aliuzijosunclassified

Untitled

2024

LINGUALET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(plg. Valotka, 2017;Petrauskaitė & Šinkūnienė, 2015;Koženiauskienė, 2013, 60-86). Intertekstai nutiesia prasminį teksto ryšį su kitais diskursais.…”

Section: Komentarų Intertekstualumas: Citatos Aliuzijosunclassified

Untitled

2024

LINGUALET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lietuvių mokslo kalbos intertekstualumas yra sulaukęs tyrėjų dėmesio (Bitinie nė 2005;Koženiauskienė 2007;Petrauskaitė, Šinkūnienė 2015), tačiau jis tipologijos ir daugiakalbiškumo požiūriu tirtas mažai. Tad šio žvalgomojo tyrimo tikslas -nu statyti intertekstines kalbotyros straipsnių sąsajas su kitomis publikacijomis, taip pat rašytomis ir ne lietuvių kalba.…”

Section: įVadasunclassified

Kalbotyros straipsnių sąsajos su kitais mokslo tekstais

Kontutytė

2023

open-series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholarly text conventions are important when writing texts, especially in a foreign language. Intertextual relations with other texts are a characteristic feature of scientific language. As Lithuanian and foreign researchers point out, this is manifested by quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing. In examining the intertextuality of academic language, researchers also draw attention to its multilingualism. Based on the above-mentioned forms of intertextuality, this article analyses the intertextuality features of linguistics articles written in Lithuanian. The analysis shows that direct quotations in Lithuanian articles include short phrases or even full sentences from other authors’ texts imbedded in a sentence, with or without introductory phrases. In English, Polish or Russian, direct quotations can also be inserted into a sentence. Quotations from other languages are given with or without translation. Paraphrasing has been observed to be more frequently used, as the reformulated statements of other authors do not destroy the linguistic integrity and cohesion of the text. This is especially useful when quoting texts in other languages. A reference is one in which the text does not directly or indirectly reproduce the statements of other authors, but merely refers in some way to previous research. Scholarly terms from other languages, usually English, presented as equivalents of other languages together with the Lithuanian term or even without it., may be treated as a case of multilingual intertextuality. Although precision is often pointed out as a feature of academic language, the linguistics articles analyzed show many instances of paraphrasing and referential intertextuality. Such intertextual interfaces substantiate the research presented in the article or the scientific issues raised, establish their place within a wider range of sources, and convey the author’s thought in a condensed way in the language of the publication, without breaking the typographic and linguistic unity of the text. Multilingual intertextuality shows that it is important for researchers of the Lithuanian language, who publish their texts in Lithuanian, to locate their research in the international context of linguistics and to establish a scientific dialogue with researchers of other countries and languages.

show abstract

Lithuanian academic discourse revisited: Features and patterns of scientific communication

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past several decades, there has been an increasing interest in academic discourse investigations with a specific focus on disciplinary, cultural, and generic aspects of academic text construction. Studies of Spanish, Italian, Greek, Portuguese, French, German, and Russian (inter alia) academic discourse have revealed not only the universal features characteristic of many writing cultures, but also unique rhetorical features, typical of only some of them. In this article, we focus on academic discourse investigations in scientific texts written in one of the lesser-studied languages, Lithuanian. We review here studies of Lithuanian scientific discourse and what those studies reveal about the specific features of Lithuanian academic discourse. The first part of the article identifies how rhetorical structures differ between English and Lithuanian academic texts, whereas the second part presents a comprehensive overview of the functional groups of linguistic units, such as metadiscourse markers, stance and engagement markers, and conceptual metaphors, and how these are different or similar to English academic discourse. The overview of the empirical studies shows the current state of knowledge about Lithuanian academic discourse and highlights some of the items that distinguish Lithuanian writing. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of identifying academic writing traditions of other languages to acknowledge diversity.

show abstract

Dar kartą apie intertekstualumą. Ką jis sako apie mokslinį tekstą? | Intertextuality in research writing revisited

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Kalbotyros straipsnių sąsajos su kitais mokslo tekstais

Lithuanian academic discourse revisited: Features and patterns of scientific communication

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About