Dangerousness and disability as predictors of psychiatric patients' legal status

Abstract

In a sample of patients admitted to two state psychiatric facilities, discriminant analyses were used to predict (1) legal status at admission (voluntary versus emergency detention), and (2) the subsequent decision to commit patients initially admitted under an order of emergency detention (court commitment versus release). Measures of preadmission dangerousness, followed by variables reflecting degree of disability or impairment, accounted for most of the variance in legal status at admission. Personal resources and demographic characteristics added little to the discrimination. Measures of disability accounted for most of the variance in the later decision to commit, whereas indices of dangerousness, personal resources, and demographics added little to discrimination of discharged and court‐committed patients. These findings reflect the gap between legal standards and the practice of civil commitment, and support the argument that degree of disability plays a more important role than dangerousness in decisions to extend the hospitalization of involuntary patients. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Local psychiatric beds appear to decrease the use of involuntary admission: a case-registry study

“…Moreover, we lack data on some variables that could be of importance to the use of involuntary admission, including degree of disability, financial status, employment, educational level, ethnicity, attitudes of doctors, caregivers and patients, etc. [5,6,8,10,23,34,48-51]. The model predicts between 9.0% (Cox & Snell R Square) and 28.7% (Nagelkerke R Square) of the variance in legal status at admission.…”

How to increase quality of care during coercive admission? A review of literature

“…Within literature describing the outside perspective of the professional, admission criteria come to the fore, for example the diagnostic and legal criteria . Additionally dangerousness, risk of harm and violence to others are criteria to take into account .…”

“…Within literature describing the outside perspective of the professional, admission criteria come to the fore, for example the diagnostic and legal criteria (3, 9,17,28). Additionally dangerousness, risk of harm and violence to others are criteria to take into account (17,28,35). (25,26,32) Being guarded (8,25,32) Pressure (6, 7, 9, 20-22, 27, 29, 33) Loss of Autonomy (29) Being humiliated (8,25,32) Being seen (8,25,32) Procedural Justice (6,7,20,22,23,29,31) Respect (21, 31) Professional…”

Involuntary admission and treatment of patients with mental disorder

“…A range of factors, such as gender, age, employment status, poverty, perceived dangerousness, and attitudes may be important in determining the manner by which jurisdictions utilize involuntary admission and coercion [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] .…”