1982
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dangerousness and Criminal Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently sex offenders are considered an especially important group to predict their likely risks of re-offending. Repetitive arrest and conviction for sex and violent offences attracts strong public disapproval, and is a major source of demands for increased punishment (Floud, 1982). Punitive approaches, such as 'three strikes' mandatory incapacitation, community notification, compulsory treatment and other 'get tough' methods have become popular and have been applied more readily to sex offenders than to other offenders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently sex offenders are considered an especially important group to predict their likely risks of re-offending. Repetitive arrest and conviction for sex and violent offences attracts strong public disapproval, and is a major source of demands for increased punishment (Floud, 1982). Punitive approaches, such as 'three strikes' mandatory incapacitation, community notification, compulsory treatment and other 'get tough' methods have become popular and have been applied more readily to sex offenders than to other offenders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 En efecto, en el ámbito anglosajón se realizaron aportaciones relevantes en esa orientación ya a comienzos de los años '80, incluso antes de que Beck popularizase la retórica del riesgo. Vid., a modo de referencia, Floud/Young, 1981;Floud, 1982: 213 ss. ;Green Wood, 1982.…”
Section: José áNgel Brandariz García Agustina Iglesias Skuljunclassified
“…En effet, Floud et Young (1981) ont bien vu que la question de la neutralisation renvoie à celle du conflit entre les droits du criminel et ceux de ses victimes potentielles. Une sentence qui tient compte de la probabilité de récidive tente d'opérer une juste redistribution de deux séries de risques : ceux que le récidiviste fait courir à ses victimes potentielles et ceux qu'il court d'être incarcéré inutilement à cause de l'inévitable incertitude de nos prédictions 26 .…”
Section: Une Juste Distribution Des Risquesunclassified