2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10144-009-0146-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dangerously few liaisons: a review of mate‐finding Allee effects

Abstract: In this paper, we review mate-finding Allee effects from ecological and evolutionary points of view. We define 'mate-finding' as mate searching in mobile animals, and also as the meeting of gametes for sessile animals and plants (pollination). We consider related issues such as mate quality and choice, sperm limitation and physiological stimulation of reproduction by conspecifics, as well as discussing the role of demographic stochasticity in generating mate-finding Allee effects. We consider the role of compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
296
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
13
296
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our population genetic analyses all indicate a significant population bottleneck associated with the speciation event, especially in southern C. pentagona populations and most pronounced in C. hystera. An associated Allee effect-scarcity of mates-may have strongly selected for self-fertilization as a form of reproductive assurance [60,61]. The associated inbreeding depression may be slight if populations are already highly inbred, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our population genetic analyses all indicate a significant population bottleneck associated with the speciation event, especially in southern C. pentagona populations and most pronounced in C. hystera. An associated Allee effect-scarcity of mates-may have strongly selected for self-fertilization as a form of reproductive assurance [60,61]. The associated inbreeding depression may be slight if populations are already highly inbred, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handful of theoretical studies have recently provided evidence that evolution can indeed help a population mitigate an Allee effect (Kanarek and Webb 2010;Cushing and Hudson 2012;Shaw and Kokko 2014b). It may be tempting to predict that any adaptation that allows an individual to overcome an Allee effect should have been selected for, since Allee effects negatively influence an individual's fitness (Taylor and Hastings 2005;Gascoigne et al 2009). However, this may not be the case if low densities have been rare during the evolutionary history of a species, and current anthropogenically changed conditions have placed populations in a novel selective environmentsuch as that encountered by any spreading population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms include male-female encounters in motile animals, encounters between pollen grains and egg cells in plants, and encounters between male and female gametes in many sessile or semi-sessile marine A c c e p t e d m a n u s c r i p t 4 invertebrates (Gascoigne et al, 2009). Evidence for Allee effects affecting reproduction in general and for mate-finding Allee effects in particular is quite widespread; observations of the latter span a wide spectrum of taxa from sheep ticks (Rohlf, 1969) to polar bears (Molnár et al, 2008) among terrestrial animals and from copepods (Kiørboe, 2006) to queen conch (Stoner and Ray-Culp, 2000) among marine species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for Allee effects affecting reproduction in general and for mate-finding Allee effects in particular is quite widespread; observations of the latter span a wide spectrum of taxa from sheep ticks (Rohlf, 1969) to polar bears (Molnár et al, 2008) among terrestrial animals and from copepods (Kiørboe, 2006) to queen conch (Stoner and Ray-Culp, 2000) among marine species. Other mechanisms by which larger population size or density may enhance reproduction success include sperm limitation, physiological stimulation of reproduction and female choice (Gascoigne et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%