2002
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2001-11-0067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dangerous liaisons: the role of “danger” signals in the immune response to gene therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(94 reference statements)
2
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Danger Model of immune tolerance suggests that the potential for activation of T cells may persist, if FIX is subsequently presented in the context of any of a number of inflammatory proteins or signals that can provide co-stimulation of antigen presenting cells and naïve T cells. 51,52 Loss of transgenic FIX expression in a recent clinical trial underscores this concern. 13 In summary, our studies of the R333Q-hFIX mouse using a host of potential protein and gene therapeutic strategies suggest that the presence of a missense mutation, with some level of circulating protein (CRM+), results in very low risk of inhibitor antibody formation or CTL response.…”
Section: Anti-factor IX Antibodies After Aav1 and Aav2 Fix T-p Zhang mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Danger Model of immune tolerance suggests that the potential for activation of T cells may persist, if FIX is subsequently presented in the context of any of a number of inflammatory proteins or signals that can provide co-stimulation of antigen presenting cells and naïve T cells. 51,52 Loss of transgenic FIX expression in a recent clinical trial underscores this concern. 13 In summary, our studies of the R333Q-hFIX mouse using a host of potential protein and gene therapeutic strategies suggest that the presence of a missense mutation, with some level of circulating protein (CRM+), results in very low risk of inhibitor antibody formation or CTL response.…”
Section: Anti-factor IX Antibodies After Aav1 and Aav2 Fix T-p Zhang mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used vectors for gene delivery are genetically engineered viruses, because they, in the long-term evolution of nature, are equipped with specific machineries that facilitate DNA transport into the nucleus of cells (Baranowski et al, 2001). However, a main drawback of viral vectors is the toxicity caused by undesirable acute immune response to viral proteins (Brown and Lillicrap, 2002;Bowers et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2003;Jooss and Chirmule, 2003;Lowenstein, 2003). Moreover, proteins from transgene expression may also exert adverse effects on normal cells either directly or indirectly through conversion of prodrugs to cytotoxic agents (Freeman et al, 1993;Rosenfeld et al, 1995;Alvarez and Curiel, 1997;Pope et al, 1997;Chada et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the cellular immune response, mediated through adenoviral specific CD8 positive T cells, eliminate the cells' expressing viral and transgene products (24). Overall the undesirable acute immune response to viral proteins was considered the main drawback of virus-based gene therapy (13,14,16).…”
Section: Gene Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%