2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolving gene therapy approaches for osteosarcoma using viral vectors: Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the transfection efficiency of the cationic liposome is relatively low compared to virus vector. Viral vectors have been the popular transgenic tool because of their higher efficiency [23,29]. Madry et al used recombinant adeno-associated viruses containing the reporter gene lacZ to transfer into the lapine and human meniscal cells in vitro and into lapine meniscal defects in vivo [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the transfection efficiency of the cationic liposome is relatively low compared to virus vector. Viral vectors have been the popular transgenic tool because of their higher efficiency [23,29]. Madry et al used recombinant adeno-associated viruses containing the reporter gene lacZ to transfer into the lapine and human meniscal cells in vitro and into lapine meniscal defects in vivo [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, viral gene delivery has significant drawbacks restricting clinical use including immunogenicity, toxicity and technical challenges for large scale production [18][19][20].…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral systems have advantages such as constant expression and expression of therapeutic genes (Sullivan, 2003). However, there are some limitations that restrict the use of these systems, which particularly include the use of viruses in production, immunogenicity, toxicity and lack of optimization in large-scale production (Witlox et al, 2007) (Figure 1). Gene therapy strategies; mutation compensation, suicide gene therapy and immunopotentiation (Witlox et al, 2007).…”
Section: Gene Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%