2010
DOI: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2010.tb00151.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damoklesschwert Referendum? Die indirekte Wirkung ausgebauter Volksrechte auf die Rechte religiöser Minderheiten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the small number of 26 cases limits any generalization of the results of the factor analysis beyond the Swiss case, it can be read as a suggestion on how the measurement of MIPEX and CRI could be refined, both, at inter-and subnational levels.Interestingly, the general issue of recognition of minorities' religions, captured by the category 'religious rights I', is not as contested as specific religious rights such as Islamic burials.Yet direct democracy could still yield an indirect effect on legislation concerning minorities' religions, for instance when legislatures respond to the mere threat of direct legislation. A similar effect could be accounted for inChristmann's (2010) analysis of cantonal parliamen-tarian debates concerning the legal recognition of minorities' religions. On the other hand, the finding that socio-structural rights are not as contested is less surprising.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the small number of 26 cases limits any generalization of the results of the factor analysis beyond the Swiss case, it can be read as a suggestion on how the measurement of MIPEX and CRI could be refined, both, at inter-and subnational levels.Interestingly, the general issue of recognition of minorities' religions, captured by the category 'religious rights I', is not as contested as specific religious rights such as Islamic burials.Yet direct democracy could still yield an indirect effect on legislation concerning minorities' religions, for instance when legislatures respond to the mere threat of direct legislation. A similar effect could be accounted for inChristmann's (2010) analysis of cantonal parliamen-tarian debates concerning the legal recognition of minorities' religions. On the other hand, the finding that socio-structural rights are not as contested is less surprising.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Accordingly, a more comprehensive conceptualization of citizenship is aimed at. Koopmans (Christmann 2010;Cattacin et al 2003). labor market access * family reunion * long term residence political participation * access to nationality * anti discrimination * CRI cultural dimension cultural requirements for naturalisation * religious rights outside public institutions * cultural rights in public institutions political representation rights (for specific cultural groups) affirmative action (labor market) Note: * = Components exhibiting sufficient variation at the cantonal level and accordingly included in the measurement of cantonal integration policies.…”
Section: How To Measure Integration Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armingeon et al. ; Walter , ) or immigration policies and minority rights (Christmann ; Manatschal ). This variation in the institutional setup and public policies allows researchers to exploit cross‐cantonal and temporal differences in policy‐making to address important topics such as tax competition (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure of attributing such values to the cases to determine to what degree they display a condition or an outcome is called 'calibration'. QCA has been used to study political phenomena, among many others, by Emmenegger (2008), Magetti (2009), Schneider (2009), or Christmann (2010.…”
Section: Qualitative Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%