2020
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dammed river: Short‐ and long‐term consequences for fish species inhabiting a river in a Mediterranean climate in central Chile

Abstract: 1. The presence of a dam disturbs river flow, which in turn directly affects the communities and evolutionary potential of riverine species. To detect the ecological effects of a dam on genetic diversity, genetic structure, and their progress in time, two riverine fishes living upstream and downstream of an irrigation reservoir were studied at two periods after its construction in 2004 in central Chile. 2. Samples of the Neotropical silverside Basilichthys microlepidotus and the pencil catfish Trichomycterus a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current genetic structure indicates that M . germanica can partially overcome both natural canyons and man-made check dams along Isel and its tributaries, although limitations in gene flow might only be detectable after a certain time 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current genetic structure indicates that M . germanica can partially overcome both natural canyons and man-made check dams along Isel and its tributaries, although limitations in gene flow might only be detectable after a certain time 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutral genetic markers allow to investigate if gene flow and therefore functional connectivity is still present along river networks 24 , 25 , if there is local population decline 26 , or ongoing migration 27 despite fragmented habitat. This information is crucial to assess the importance of tributaries and the contribution of single populations to genetic diversity further up- or downstream 28 , 29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations from the null models may be detected when there are biotic or abiotic forces disrupting patterns of unidirectional genetic accumulation, differentiation, and/or IBD. Various abiotic barriers that have been reported as drivers of genetic divergence in riverine fishes include high-energy rapids (Alter et al, 2015(Alter et al, , 2017Markert et al, 2010;Schwarzer et al, 2011), waterfalls (Kanno et al, 2011;Lujan et al, 2020), environmental gradients (Brauer et al, 2018;Tobler et al, 2008), and artificial barriers such as dams (Hansen et al, 2014;Samarasin et al, 2017;Vega-Retter et al, 2020). Such features in riverscapes often generate genetic structure in freshwater fishes (Lundberg et al, 2000;Thomaz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have evaluated the effects of dams on fish population structure (Baggio et al., 2018; Esguícero & Arcifa, 2010; Ferreira et al., 2017; Underwood et al., 2016), as well as genetic diversity (Blanchet et al., 2010; Faulks et al., 2011; Horreo et al., 2011; Pavlova et al., 2017; Van Leeuwen et al., 2018). However, to the best of our knowledge, how genetic diversity levels are affected over time is understudied (Vega‐Retter et al., 2020). While a spatial understanding of the consequences of extensive habitat loss and fragmentation is essential, a multitemporal approach that considers these same consequences is also relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%