2016
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damaged goods?: an empirical cohort study of blood specimens collected 12 to 23 hours after birth in newborn screening in California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
4
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with closer proximity to the post‐natal TSH surge and the four‐fold reduction in TSH concentration that occurs over the first few days of life . Similarly, the Californian screening programme recently reported a 10‐fold increase in false‐positive CH screens in samples collected between 12 and 23 hours as compared with their regular collection time of 24‐48 hours (false‐positive rate 0.1% vs 0.01%) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with closer proximity to the post‐natal TSH surge and the four‐fold reduction in TSH concentration that occurs over the first few days of life . Similarly, the Californian screening programme recently reported a 10‐fold increase in false‐positive CH screens in samples collected between 12 and 23 hours as compared with their regular collection time of 24‐48 hours (false‐positive rate 0.1% vs 0.01%) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This is consistent with closer proximity to the post-natal TSH surge and the four-fold reduction in TSH concentration that occurs over the first few days of life 23,24. Similarly, the Californian screening programme recently reported a 10-fold increase in false-positive CH screens in samples collected between 12 and 23 hours as compared with their regular collection time of 24-48 hours (false-positive rate 0.1% vs 0.01%) 25. Determining the optimal time for collection of newborn screening samples requires consideration of the balance between changing levels of disease-specific markers after birth and consequent changes to screening sensitivity and specificity across a number of different disorders.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The panel includes conditions for which no suitable NBS analyte currently exists as a primary screening modality. We used a tNGS screening algorithm for Menkes disease on DNA extracted from DBS specimens and were able to assess for multiple mutation types in a single assay while fulfilling the rapid turnaround requirement for NBS [ 34 ]. The sensitivity of tNGS for ATP7A abnormalities was significantly increased by adding CNV detection capability since 12–20% of Menkes disease cases involve CNVs [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birth weight instead of gestational age was used as a marker of prematurity, because gestational age is often not collected by state programs or may be inaccurate. Likewise, stratification by collection times, particularly before or after 24 h, is important to consider as state practices continue to push for earlier collection times [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%