1999
DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780040901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Modes in Dental Layer Structures

Abstract: Natural teeth (enamel/dentin) and most restorations are essentially layered structures. This study examines the hypothesis that coating thickness and coating/substrate mismatch are key factors in the determination of contact-induced damage in clinically relevant bilayer composites. Accordingly, we study crack patterns in two model "coating/substrate" bilayer systems conceived to simulate crown and tooth structures, at opposite extremes of elastic/plastic mismatch: porcelain on glass-infiltrated alumina ("soft/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of crack slanting was greater for smaller marginal angles and shorter distances from the ceramic/resin interface. Several studies have reported on crack slanting or deflection in ceramic materials with a marginal angle of 90° 13,14,[22][23][24] . Crack slanting or deflection occurred with marginal angles of 45 and 60°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of crack slanting was greater for smaller marginal angles and shorter distances from the ceramic/resin interface. Several studies have reported on crack slanting or deflection in ceramic materials with a marginal angle of 90° 13,14,[22][23][24] . Crack slanting or deflection occurred with marginal angles of 45 and 60°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First and foremost, it can emulate the loading conditions experienced by dental restorations and it is also able to represent the important aspects of crown response in oral function; additionally, it is an economical and simple testing protocol 2,7) . With this testing system, contact damage modes have been identified as cone cracking (brittle mode) and/or micro-deformation yield (quasi-plastic mode) on the surface of layered ceramic structures, and as radial cracking at the subsurface of the top layer 2,5,7,8) . These damage modes have been reported in many investigations, beginning with monolayer ceramic systems 2,5,6) , and proceeding to bilayer [8][9][10][11] and trilayer [11][12][13] systems with dentin-like substrate materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this testing system, contact damage modes have been identified as cone cracking (brittle mode) and/or micro-deformation yield (quasi-plastic mode) on the surface of layered ceramic structures, and as radial cracking at the subsurface of the top layer 2,5,7,8) . These damage modes have been reported in many investigations, beginning with monolayer ceramic systems 2,5,6) , and proceeding to bilayer [8][9][10][11] and trilayer [11][12][13] systems with dentin-like substrate materials. Further on fracture damage studies, tests investigating coating/substrate mismatch (in terms of moduli of elasticity) 8,10,12,14) and thicknesses of these layers 8,10,12) have been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such transitions in crack mode have been well documented for brittle coatings fused to soft substrates. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] In situ observations in a model transparent bilayer system consisting of a soda-lime glass layer bonded to a plastic substrate have proved especially useful in describing such modes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%