1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199704)26:4<423::aid-eqe650>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Models for the Seismic Response of Brick Masonry Shear Walls. Part I: The Mortar Joint Model and Its Applications

Abstract: SUMMARYThe response of brick masonry walls to in-plane horizontal cyclic loads analogous to those induced during seismic events is analysed by applying constitutive models which take into account the mechanical behaviour of each component and its interfaces, i.e. decohesion and slipping in the mortar joints and failure in bricks. To this end, a damage model for mortar joints is proposed and then applied in two different approaches to the analysis of brick masonry walls which are described both in the present p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
111
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
111
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental outcomes [8] and inspection of failure modes of real URM structures show that cracks usually run along brickmortar interfaces and can then continue through bricks following continuous paths. These intrinsic features of the brick-masonry structural behaviour suggested the use of nonlinear interface elements for detailed finite element analyses of URM panels under monotonic and cyclic loads [9,10]. In such structural models zero-thickness interfaces are employed to represent the nonlinear behaviour of mortar and brick-mortar interface as well as potential 3 cracks in bricks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental outcomes [8] and inspection of failure modes of real URM structures show that cracks usually run along brickmortar interfaces and can then continue through bricks following continuous paths. These intrinsic features of the brick-masonry structural behaviour suggested the use of nonlinear interface elements for detailed finite element analyses of URM panels under monotonic and cyclic loads [9,10]. In such structural models zero-thickness interfaces are employed to represent the nonlinear behaviour of mortar and brick-mortar interface as well as potential 3 cracks in bricks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He modeled bricks by continuous elastic elements that were covered by the surface elements (Page, A.W., 1978). Based on the characteristics of cement between the bricks and taking into account a characteristic equation of bricks, Gambaruta and Lagumarsio (Gambarotta and Lagomarsino, 1997) designed a composite model and applied it for finite element analysis of lateral movement of brick shear walls. Also in 1996, Alcocer et al examined the behavior of masonry walls having pod by Bar grid and cover cement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is boulders and the second is bricks. The first type is known for its cracking resistance due to having irregular mortar interfaces 3 . Foundations of all the investigated models were of the same configuration and sub-base, resulting in the same stiffness 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%