2021
DOI: 10.3390/app112210605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Identification in Warren Truss Bridges by Two Different Time–Frequency Algorithms

Abstract: Recently, a number of authors have been focusing on drive-by monitoring methods, exploiting sensors mounted on the vehicle rather than on the bridge to be monitored, with clear advantages in terms of cost and flexibility. This work aims at further exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of novel tools for indirect health monitoring of railway structures, by introducing a higher level of accuracy in damage modelling, achieve more close-to-reality results. A numerical study is carried out by means of a FE 3D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary idea behind these techniques is that structural damage modifies the mechanical properties of the bridge and, therefore, the dynamic behavior of the vehicle interacting with it [22]. Then, the condition of the bridge may be determined based on the dynamic responses detected on board the train, such as on the axle box, bogie frame, and carbody.…”
Section: Overview Of Drive-by Condition Assessment Of Railway Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary idea behind these techniques is that structural damage modifies the mechanical properties of the bridge and, therefore, the dynamic behavior of the vehicle interacting with it [22]. Then, the condition of the bridge may be determined based on the dynamic responses detected on board the train, such as on the axle box, bogie frame, and carbody.…”
Section: Overview Of Drive-by Condition Assessment Of Railway Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the condition of the bridge may be determined based on the dynamic responses detected on board the train, such as on the axle box, bogie frame, and carbody. According to Bernardini et al [22], the primary concern regarding the practical applicability of the drive-by method is that the train's response may be affected not only by the condition of the bridge but also by factors unrelated to the damage, such as the level of track irregularities, the vehicle's dynamic response to different passenger loads, and other uncertainties related to the train's speed variation and accurate positioning with respect to the bridge.…”
Section: Overview Of Drive-by Condition Assessment Of Railway Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual inspection methods are considered less effective. Visual methods provide valuable information when monitoring protocols are in place, but their weakness lies in the dependence on the skills and experience of inspection operators to identify damage [9]. Consequently, the concept of structural health, also known as Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), has been developed in the field of Structural Engineering [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, EMD-based techniques generate the so-called intrinsic mode functions. When the EMD-based techniques are associated with the Hilbert transform, the resulting combination is known as Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), which has been used for radar-based vital sign detection, human activity recognition, and dam-age assessment [29][30][31][32]. Although EMD-based algorithms might be utilized for the analysis of non-stationary/nonlinear signals and have demonstrated its robustness and validity for various applications, it still lacks a reliable and generally accepted theoretical foundation, which would allow for convergence proofs and systematic optimization of the method [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%