This article presents an efficient methodology for the calibration of a numerical model of a Sgnss freight railway wagon based on experimental modal parameters, namely natural frequencies and mode shapes. Dynamic tests were performed for two distinct static loading configurations, tare weight and current operational overload, under demanding test conditions, particularly during an unloading operation of the train and without disturbing its tight operational schedule. These conditions impose restrictions to the tests, especially regarding the test duration, sensor positioning and system excitation. The experimental setups involve the use of several high-sensitivity accelerometers strategically distributed along with the vehicle platform and bogies in the vertical direction. The modal identification was performed with the application of the enhanced frequency-domain decomposition (EFDD) method, allowing the estimation of 10 natural frequencies and mode shapes associated with structural movements of the wagon platform, which in some cases are coupled with rigid body movements. A detailed 3D FE model of the freight wagon was developed including the platform, bogies, wheelsets, primary suspensions and wheel–rail interface. The model calibration was performed sequentially, first with the unloaded wagon model and then with the loaded wagon model, resorting to an iterative method based on a genetic algorithm. The calibration process allowed the obtainment of the optimal values of eight numerical parameters, including a double estimation of the vertical stiffness of the primary suspensions under the unloaded and loaded static configurations. The results demonstrate that the primary suspensions present an elastic/almost elastic behaviour. The comparison of experimental and numerical responses before and after calibration revealed significant improvements in the numerical models and a very good correlation between the experimental and numerical responses after calibration.
Bridges and viaducts are critical components of railway transport infrastructures, providing safe and efficient means for trains to cross over natural barriers such as rivers and valleys. Ensuring the continuous safe operation of these structures is therefore essential to avoid disastrous economic consequences and even human losses. Drive-by methodologies have emerged as a potential and cost-effective monitoring solution for accurately and prematurely detecting damage based on instrumented vehicles while minimizing disruptions to train operations. This paper presents a critical review of drive-by methodologies applied to bridges and viaducts. Firstly, the premises of the method are briefly reviewed, and the potential applications are discussed. In sequence, several works involving the use of drive-by methodologies for modal characteristic extraction are presented, encompassing the most important methodologies developed over time as well as recent advancements in the field. Finally, the problem of damage identification is discussed—both in relation to modal and non-modal parameter-based techniques considering the most promising features and the current advancements in the development of methodologies for damage detection based on machine learning algorithms. A comprehensive conclusion is presented at the end of the article, summarizing the achievements and providing perspectives for future developments. By critically assessing the application of drive-by methodologies to bridges and viaducts, this paper contributes to the advancement of knowledge in this crucial area, emphasizing the significance of continuous monitoring for ensuring the integrity and safety of these vital transport infrastructures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.