2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-1237(06)80015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Control Surgery for Abdominal Trauma

Abstract: Damage control is not a modern concept, but the application of this approach represents a new paradigm in surgery, borne out of a need to save patients with severe exsanguinating injuries. Definitive control and repair may be accomplished in the immediate post injury setting but the physiological derangement due to massive shock state resulting from the severe injury and the resuscitation that follows, often leads to a fully repaired but dead patient. The vicious triad of death in trauma, namely hypothermia, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of its primary benefits, in this study setting, damage control surgery was shown as a risk factor for mortality. It was also reported in a previous study that complications and mortality were high in patients undergoing damage control surgery ( 36 ). Complications such as wound infection rate (50%–100%), intraabdominal abscess (25%–8%), enterocutaneous fistula (20%–25%), abdominal hypertension in 20% of patients, and mortality (12%–67%) were reported in various studies ( 37 39 ) Therefore, the trauma surgeon should follow the recommended guidelines for the application of damage control surgery to minimize mortality rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Regardless of its primary benefits, in this study setting, damage control surgery was shown as a risk factor for mortality. It was also reported in a previous study that complications and mortality were high in patients undergoing damage control surgery ( 36 ). Complications such as wound infection rate (50%–100%), intraabdominal abscess (25%–8%), enterocutaneous fistula (20%–25%), abdominal hypertension in 20% of patients, and mortality (12%–67%) were reported in various studies ( 37 39 ) Therefore, the trauma surgeon should follow the recommended guidelines for the application of damage control surgery to minimize mortality rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Damage control surgery was described in the 1980s as an option for haemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma patients with severe exsanguinating injuries [21]. Patients who demonstrate the triad of coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acidosis in emergency situations are candidates for it [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who demonstrate the triad of coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acidosis in emergency situations are candidates for it [22]. It is accomplished by initial abbreviated laparotomy, correction of abnormal physiological parameters, and later definitive injury repair during a second operation [21]. A 3 ½ year retrospective study evaluated the medical records of 46 patients who suffered penetrating abdominal trauma which necessitated laparotomy and urgent transfusion of over 10 units of packed red blood cells [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Damage control surgery consisting of an initial abbreviated surgery to control bleeding and contamination, followed by correction of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis in the critical care unit and timely re-exploration, has promising outcomes in the management of patients with critical trauma [ 12 ]. Endoscopic closure by endoclips is found to be a safe, feasible, and effective technique for the treatment of ERCP-related duodenal perforation [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%