2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(00)00292-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage assessment of structures using modal test data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the method proposed in the paper is efficient and utilizes the benefits of both EA, as well as the regularization function by giving much better damage assessment. It can be seen that better results are obtained with the proposed approach as compared to other researchers using this example [16,45]. …”
Section: Experimental Beam (Case 3)mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results show that the method proposed in the paper is efficient and utilizes the benefits of both EA, as well as the regularization function by giving much better damage assessment. It can be seen that better results are obtained with the proposed approach as compared to other researchers using this example [16,45]. …”
Section: Experimental Beam (Case 3)mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The first simulated beam is only damaged at one location, and the second simulated beam is damaged at more than one location to check the effectiveness of objective functions at various noise levels. For the third beam, experimental data are available for damage [45]. The effectiveness of the three objective functions is then evaluated on both simulated and experimental data.…”
Section: Damage Detection Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this phase certain damage sensitive features, called damage index (DI), are extracted from the structure's response, either empirically obtained or numerically simulated, to measure its discrepancies from the response in the intact state. Previous studies show that the features which capture nonlinearities in the structural response are generally more sensitive to damage, less sensitive to environmental conditions, and hence, more reliable for the purpose of damage detection compared to the DIs that capture linear phenomena such as modal properties [4][5][6][7].Note that the source of nonlinearities can be material, geometry, or nonlinear dynamics phenomenon such as dispersion, mode mixing, and damping. The fractal dimension of the attractor of time-series is the basis for defining DIs in [8][9][10][11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%