2019
DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2019.1597145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dalits and Dispossession: A Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, this case demonstrates the difficulty faced by lower castes in gaining (and retaining) even low-paying wage labour in the SEZ. 39 See 'Dalits and Dispossession: A Comparison' (Agarwal & Levien, 2020) for an extensive comparative analysis of the Rajpura and Polepally cases.…”
Section: Dalit Debt Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, this case demonstrates the difficulty faced by lower castes in gaining (and retaining) even low-paying wage labour in the SEZ. 39 See 'Dalits and Dispossession: A Comparison' (Agarwal & Levien, 2020) for an extensive comparative analysis of the Rajpura and Polepally cases.…”
Section: Dalit Debt Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, in the empirical discussion I show how the specific outcomes in Polepally differ from those identified by Levien in substantial ways and explain how those differences are rooted in the varying nature of project characteristics and pre-existing agrarian hierarchies particular to each region. I argue that the much lower compensation for a relatively labour-intensive SEZ in Polepally leads to more proletarianization and labour market incorporation, whereas in Levien's case, the Rajasthan government's policy of providing a stake in the real estate boom brings about more instances of upward mobility and petty asset management among the dispossessed (see also Agarwal & Levien, 2020). In addition to adding an important case to our comparative understanding of dispossession, this paper calls attention to an under-examined aspect of dispossession in the political economic literature: its effect on rural debt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural individuals and households with even small advantages in education, income, and social networksall highly bound up with caste statusare able to negotiate new opportunities for real estate speculation and construction contracts from which others are locked out (cf. Levien 2018;Agarwal and Levien 2020). This uneven terrain often produces compliance from the better placed, diminishing the potency of resistance, or it generates dominant-caste led protests with narrow aims of compensation that shut-out the interests of tenants and landless.…”
Section: Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance to dispossession is often most fierce in mining areas, where both the displaced as well as those in neighboring villages face disastrous social and environmental effects from extractive projects; the results can take the form of a kind of paralysis, as Oskarsson (2018) puts it, with seemingly no settlement possible. Relatively generalized impoverishment has also been occurring in the case of some public sector SEZs, such as Polepally in Telangana, where largely Dalit semi-proletarians have been dispossessed with scandalously low compensation (Agarwal and Levien 2020).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Dispossession Under Various Compensation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, as we saw in Kurnool, bureaucrats also subscribe to the notion that the state has very few obligations to Dalit recipients of conditional titles like Kailash, and the land they received is a benefit rather than a right. Dalit land is frequently expropriated for large-scale development projects with the promise of economic development and social upliftment (Agarwal and Levien, 2020). However, although it seems as if governments have delimited a juridical field where land for subaltern groups cannot push past the discursive limits of paternalistic 'land assignment' and individuated claims, this governmentalizing process is belied by robust discourses of possession and entitlement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%