Indebted by dispossession: The long‐term impacts of a Special Economic Zone on caste inequality in rural Telangana

Abstract

This paper contributes to a growing scholarship examining the ways in which dispossession in neoliberal India is reinforcing and reconfiguring agrarian social hierarchies. Existing studies have focussed on the differential successes of villagers in Special Economic Zone (SEZ)-generated real estate markets, incorporation of land losers into stratified labour markets and the caste-based politics of dispossession. Few studies, however, have systematically explored the long-term implications of state-orchestrated dispossession on agrarian credit and debt relations. Based on longterm fieldwork on a village partially expropriated for a SEZ in the South Indian state of Telangana, this study shows how dispossession has led to a sharp rise of overindebtedness within the land losing population. Dispossession deprived villagers of land and livestock; low compensation was inadequate to obtain replacement assets; and labour inside the SEZ was insufficient to ensure

“Life is a Gamble”

“…Of course, mobility has always produced debts for those who go, and profits for those who facilitate their movement (Mathew 2016;Schouten 2022). It is not necessarily that people migrate more than they used to, or that farmers take on more debts than they used to (Agarwal 2021;Federici 2012;Gerber 2014;Graeber 2011;Shah and Lerche 2020). Anthropologists have conceptualized how debt fuels migration (Achtnich 2022;Kleinman 2019;Piot with Batema 2019;Roitman 2005;Scheele 2012), and the gendered implications of mobility debt for families (Fer-guson 1999;Gaibazzi 2013;Ghosh 2015;Grabska and Fanjoy 2015;Melly 2011;Parreñas 2005).…”

Reproductive binds: The gendered economy of debt in a Syrian refugee farmworker camp

“…Debt was central to foundational debates about agrarian transformation and has had a recent revival within critical agrarian studies (Gerber, 2021; Kautsky, 1988; Lenin, 1974). Across this diverse body of research, debt is conceived as a key lever of agrarian capitalism, a force of class differentiation and displacement in the countryside and an increasingly widespread mechanism of labour intensification and exploitation (Agarwal, 2021; Arango Vásquez, 2020; Gerber, 2013, 2014). While agrarian scholars have long recognized the links between labour fragmentation and crises of reproduction (Bernstein, 2003), explicitly feminist analyses of these issues—particularly concerning the conjugated effects of debt and displacement—have only recently gained wider scholarly attention (Cousins et al, 2018; Gidwani & Ramamurthy, 2018; Guérin, 2013; Guérin et al, 2023; Natarajan & Brickell, 2022; Ossome & Naidu, 2021; Prosnitz, 2023; Shah & Lerche, 2020).…”

“…Contemporary agrarian scholars continue to emphasize agrarian debt's dynamic and contradictory relationship to processes of differentiation, displacement and uneven development (Agarwal, 2021;Arango Vásquez, 2020;Gerber, 2013Gerber, , 2014Green, 2022). Debt was, and continues to be, a vital component of agriculturalists' struggles over the maintenance and reproduction of their livelihoods in the face of wage stagnation, labour casualization and dwindling public resources.…”