2014
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2014.940980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily functioning profile of children with attention deficit hyperactive disorder: A pilot study using an ecological assessment

Abstract: Children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often present with activities of daily living (ADL) performance deficits. This study aimed to compare the performance characteristics of children with ADHD to those of controls based on the Do-Eat assessment tool, and to establish the tool's validity. Participants were 23 children with ADHD and 24 matched controls, aged 6-9 years. In addition to the Do-Eat, the Children Activity Scale-Parent (ChAS-P) and the Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two main types of ecological assessment of EF have been developed and studied [17]: (1) rating scales/questionnaires evaluating EF in common daily situations (at home or in school), such as the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF) [18][19][20] or the Dysexecutive Questionnaire for Children [21] and (2) performance-based assessments. Functional assessments may include (a) functional >"paper and pencil" tasks simulating situations close to daily life tasks but performed in an office, such as the Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C) [21] or (b) real-life situation tasks with observation of actual performance in a natural environment, such as the Do-Eat [22,23], the Weekly Calendar Planning Assessment [24], or the Children's Cooking Task (CCT) [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main types of ecological assessment of EF have been developed and studied [17]: (1) rating scales/questionnaires evaluating EF in common daily situations (at home or in school), such as the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF) [18][19][20] or the Dysexecutive Questionnaire for Children [21] and (2) performance-based assessments. Functional assessments may include (a) functional >"paper and pencil" tasks simulating situations close to daily life tasks but performed in an office, such as the Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C) [21] or (b) real-life situation tasks with observation of actual performance in a natural environment, such as the Do-Eat [22,23], the Weekly Calendar Planning Assessment [24], or the Children's Cooking Task (CCT) [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eight included articles reported on five performance-based EF assessment tools: (1) Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C) [ 20 ], (2) Children's Cooking Task (CCT) [ 21 23 ], (3) Children's Kitchen Task Assessment (CKTA) [ 24 ], (4) Do-Eat [ 25 , 26 ], and (5) PETA [ 27 ]. In combination, the tools were tested among typically developing children and children with conditions between the ages of 5-12 years old ( n = 684) from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds in several countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process of strategy internalization is recommended by the different models of self-regulated learning (Zimmerman, 2002;Pin-trich, 2000;Rosário, 2004), and EF intervention (Dawson & Guare, 2010;Mason et al, 2012;Harris et al, 2012). In addition, as currently believed, the NR must produce changes in areas that are important to a patient's daily life, that is, it must have ecological value (Wilson, 2013;Rosenblum, Frisch, Deutsh-Castel, & Josman, 2014). Additionally, the selected educational models of self-regulated learning predict three phases for the resolution of a task, engaging different EF components in each one of them: planning (task analysis), execution (acting, monitoring, and controlling) and evaluation (self-reflection) (Pintrich, 2000;Zimmerman, 2002;Rosário, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%