2017
DOI: 10.5937/socpreg1702236c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily commuting of female population in Vojvodina

Abstract: Јована Чикић Снежана Стојшин

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bukurov (1970). Cikic and Stojšin (2017) analyzed daily commuting of female population in Vojvodina. From the standpoint of the examination of commuting, it is necessary to consolidate the gravitational affinity of the settlement towards the central settlement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bukurov (1970). Cikic and Stojšin (2017) analyzed daily commuting of female population in Vojvodina. From the standpoint of the examination of commuting, it is necessary to consolidate the gravitational affinity of the settlement towards the central settlement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is pointed out that there are reciprocal links between the characteristics of mobility and the family, that marital/family characteristics are simultaneously inciters and inhibitors of mobility, and that mobility redefines the key elements of marital/family life 46 . Some of these problems are also addressed by the authors of the papers published in Review, writing about: a) the importance of family cohesion as a factor of adaptation in the process of immigration (Jarić, 2001;Ljubičić, 2006a), b) the family and refugees (as a specific form of forced migrations), with a focus on the impact of this social situation on family roles, networks and solidarity, as well as the social position of the family and its members 47 , and c) the capacity for mobility of women in daily migrations interpreted by the hypothesis on household/family responsibility (Čikić, Stojšin, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Истиче се да између обележја мобилности и породице постоје реципрочне везе, да су брачна/породична обележја истовремено подстрекач, али и инхибитор мобилности, као и да мобилност редефинише кључне елементе брачног/породичног живота 46 . На неке од ових проблема пажњу скрећу и аутори ра-дова објављених у Прегледу, пишући о: а) важности породичне кохезије као фактора адаптације у процесу имиграције (Jarić, 2001;Ljubičić, 2006a), б) породици и избеглиштву (као специфичној форми присилних миграција), стављајући фокус на утицај овог социјалног стања на породичне улоге, мреже и солидарност, као и друштвени положај породице и њених чланова 47 и в) капацитету за мобилност жена у дневним миграцијама који се тумачи хипотезом о одговорности о домаћинству/ породици (Čikić & Stojšin, 2017).…”
Section: текстови са тематиком која непосредно припада социологији поunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations