2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32505-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DABSTERS: A Privacy Preserving e-Voting Protocol for Permissioned Blockchain

Abstract: With the immutability property and decentralized architecture, Blockchain technology is considered as a revolution for several topics. For electronic voting, it can be used to ensure voter privacy, the integrity of votes, and the verifiability of vote results. More precisely permissioned Blockchains could be the solution for many of the e-voting issues. In this paper, we start by evaluating some of the existing Blockchain-based e-voting systems and analyze their drawbacks. We then propose a fully-decentralized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cost evaluation is a testing approach in which writers assess the expenses associated with using their product. It is essential when the Blockchain platform is open to the public and employs a cryptocurrency such as Ethereum, where each action has a cost measured in gas [ 151 , 159 ] conducted three types of tests, while only [ 131 , 183 ] ran four types.…”
Section: Results Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost evaluation is a testing approach in which writers assess the expenses associated with using their product. It is essential when the Blockchain platform is open to the public and employs a cryptocurrency such as Ethereum, where each action has a cost measured in gas [ 151 , 159 ] conducted three types of tests, while only [ 131 , 183 ] ran four types.…”
Section: Results Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application is resistant Application is not resistant DDOS [21], [26], [26], [27], [34], [35], [63], [64] [44], [72] [22], [28], [33], [53], [84] [25], [50], [58], [77] Sybil Attack [21], [25], [27], [63] [28] Man of the Middle [44], [53] -Byzantine Fault [20], [25], [27], [31]- [33], [63], [75] [22] Coercion [21], [26], [31] [39], [74], [80], [85] [20], [26]- [28], [33], [53] [33], [40], [41], [45], [50], [60], [78], [86] Brute-Force Attack [23], [87] -DDoS attack because it is almost impossible for the adversary to compromise all the servers. If a DDoS attack occurs, the system will continue to ...…”
Section: Attack/threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a system ensures that the coercer cannot be convinced of how a voter is voting, even if the voter cooperates with the coercer. As illustrated in Table 3, apart from a few exceptions [21], [26], [31] [39], [74], [80], [85], several applications are susceptible to this type of attack [20], [26]- [28], [33], [53] [33], [40], [41], [45], [50], [60], [78], [86] because it is impossible to prevent a user from voting in front of someone else or selling his key. This is a major flaw of e-voting that is unfortunately almost impossible to overcome today.…”
Section: Attack/threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, confidentiality of the individual vote is a fundamental component of a voting system however default settings within blockchain do not fulfil this requirement. Consequently, recent efforts such as [41] have focused at achieving privacy-aware voting overlaying blockchain technology to fulfil this requirement. With respect to double utilization in e-voting, existing approaches rely on the assumptions that majority of computing resources are controlled by honest miners.…”
Section: Blockchain-based E-votingmentioning
confidence: 99%