1995
DOI: 10.1016/0300-483x(94)02909-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxicity of NO2 gas to cultured human and murine cells in an inverted monolayer exposure system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2B) and are then transformed to sulfuric and nitric acids, respectively, resulting in that the acidic environment likely causes direct damage to membrane proteins of A549 cells. This process is assumed to sufficiently take place at a lower concentration range of SO2 and NO2 gases, since it has previously been reported that the concentration of intercellular glutathione decreases upon exposure to 1 -20ppm NO2 gas for 1 h. 27 Note that glutathione is an important antioxidant in maintaining the intracellular redox balance to protect against oxidants, free radicals, and electrophiles. [28][29][30] In contrast, since CO does not produce acids in the aqueous media (Fig.…”
Section: Responses Of Cells To Gaseous Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B) and are then transformed to sulfuric and nitric acids, respectively, resulting in that the acidic environment likely causes direct damage to membrane proteins of A549 cells. This process is assumed to sufficiently take place at a lower concentration range of SO2 and NO2 gases, since it has previously been reported that the concentration of intercellular glutathione decreases upon exposure to 1 -20ppm NO2 gas for 1 h. 27 Note that glutathione is an important antioxidant in maintaining the intracellular redox balance to protect against oxidants, free radicals, and electrophiles. [28][29][30] In contrast, since CO does not produce acids in the aqueous media (Fig.…”
Section: Responses Of Cells To Gaseous Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of in vitro studies for assessing the health effects relating to smoke toxicity have been derived from studies of carbon monoxide (Lee II et al, 1981), nitrogen dioxide (Tu et al, 1995;Aufderheide et al, 2002), volatile organic compounds (Bonsi et al, 2002), combustion particles (Okeson et al, 2003), and smoke toxicity derived from cigarettes and diesel exhausts Ritter et al, 2003;Ritter et al, 2004). However, to our knowledge no in vitro test system is currently accepted or validated for the study of toxic effects derived from fire combustion products using human cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system must be practical, reliable and suitable to ensure the effective contact between combustion toxicants and cells whilst closely simulating human exposure conditions. In the area of in vitro toxicity studies for inhalation, sampling and exposure methods have been investigated using the following four techniques: (a) sampling the particulate phase on filters followed by the investigation of the effects of suspended or extracted particles (Bay et al, 2001;Putnam et al, 2002;Tewes et al, 2003;Roemer et al, 2004) (b) sampling the gas phase in a culture medium, PBS (phosphate buffer solution) (Tewes et al, 2003;Roemer et al, 2004) and DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) (c) exposure of adherent or suspended cells covered by medium to the gas phase (Lee II et al, 1981;Tu et al, 1995) and (d) direct exposure at the air/liquid interface with a specific flow rate Ritter et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A human pulmonary type II-like epithelial cell line A-549 has been found to acquire considerable resistance to exogenous NO 2 , perhaps due to considerably higher levels of cellular glutathione [6]. On the contrary, HUVEC and C-21 cell lines display both low pre-exposure GSH (reduced glutathione) levels and a high sensitivity to NO 2 [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, HUVEC and C-21 cell lines display both low pre-exposure GSH (reduced glutathione) levels and a high sensitivity to NO 2 [6]. However, the reasons for intracellular variation in NO 2 sensitivity remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%