2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10039-012-0038-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxicity evaluation of three light-cured dentin adhesive materials on human gingival fibroblasts, ex vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the Clearfil SE Bond showed severe cytotoxicity to all cell types, whereas Adper Single Bond 2 was reasonably well tolerated. These results are consistent with others described in the literature, although different experimental conditions were reported [ 14 , 18 , 28 , 29 ]. Demirci et al [ 14 ] found that Clearfil SE Bond leads to decreased cell viability in a concentration-dependent mode.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Overall, the Clearfil SE Bond showed severe cytotoxicity to all cell types, whereas Adper Single Bond 2 was reasonably well tolerated. These results are consistent with others described in the literature, although different experimental conditions were reported [ 14 , 18 , 28 , 29 ]. Demirci et al [ 14 ] found that Clearfil SE Bond leads to decreased cell viability in a concentration-dependent mode.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Monomers such as TEGDMA, HEMA, and 10-MDP appeared to contribute to the inflammation and inhibition of odontoblastic differentiation also by inducing oxidative stress via the production of reactive oxygen species and reduction of intracellular glutathione levels [ 17 , 19 , 29 , 30 ]. Moreover, the combination of Bis-GMA, dimethacrylate, and/or polyalcene acids in the bonding system may play a role in the apparent cytotoxicity of this product and may suppress the healing capacity of the pulp tissue [ 7 , 31 ]. In a study by Lee et al [ 32 ], the absence of complete bridging in a group treated with TheraCal was attributed to the lower biocompatibility of the material, which caused a higher degree of inflammation due to the acrylic monomer Bis-GMA present in the material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test has been used by many authors in order to evaluate the cytotoxicity of various materials for application in Dentistry [29][30][31][32]. The MTT assay is reported to have several advantages including the fast analyses, measurements and management of many samples [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%